Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Rossi
Citation | 35 F.2d 667 |
Decision Date | 04 November 1929 |
Docket Number | No. 8506.,8506. |
Parties | STANDARD ACC. INS. CO. v. ROSSI. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) |
Merritt U. Hayden, of Detroit, Mich. (Price Shofner, of Little Rock, Ark., on the brief), for appellant.
Ed. B. Dillon and S. S. Jefferies, both of Little Rock, Ark., for appellee.
Before KENYON and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges.
This suit is brought by appellee as the widow of Joseph Rossi, deceased, who held an accident policy in appellant company. By this policy appellant insured the deceased against loss resulting from bodily injuries effected directly, exclusively, and independently of all other causes through accidental means. It is conceded that on the 20th day of February, 1927, the automobile of Joseph Rossi, in which he was riding, collided with another automobile, with the result that Mr. Rossi's car was overturned. No witness saw Mr. Rossi while in his car prior to the collision, and none of them saw him alight from the car. He was seen, however, standing on the walk or curb at or about the point where the accident occurred. The testimony tends to establish that Mr. Rossi was taken to his home, but was not continuously confined to bed, nor to the house, until March 5, 1927. In the meantime, he was driven down town, on at least three occasions, where he transacted some business, and attended police court in connection with a trial growing out of this same collision. On the latter date he took to his bed, where he remained until March 11th, on which day he died. The testimony produced by appellee, and embodied in a hypothetical question propounded to expert witnesses, was to the effect that two days before his death his color began to change to a dark blue, which continued, and that shortly before death his breathing became labored and he suffered a severe hemorrhage, in which there was expelled from his mouth a large quantity of bluish, lumpy, coagulated, and stringy blood. Before the accident, his complexion was ruddy, and his general physical appearance was that of health. The testimony of plaintiff's experts was to the effect that death was occasioned by thrombosis or embolus, resulting from trauma. As one witness put it:
It is conceded that some years prior to the accident Mr. Rossi had had what one of the expert witnesses for plaintiff describes "as an extensive tubercular process." He says:
X-ray pictures taken in November, 1926, disclosed these lesions — then apparently healed. There was a great deal of scar tissue scattered throughout the lungs, indicating that he had had a very extensive involvement of those organs. It was the contention of appellant that death was caused by this tubercular condition, aggravated and excited into renewed activity perhaps by the accident, but nevertheless the primary cause of death. In support of this contention it introduced the certificate of death, filed by the attending physician, which contained the following:
Again, the same physician in his initial report, submitted to appellant on February 25, 1927, stated that the accident occurred because "car in which patient was riding was struck by another car and turned over." In reply to the question, "Give an accurate and complete description of the nature and extent of the injury," he replied:
He also stated in answer to inquiry of whether there was any history or evidence present of pre-existing injury or disease, that deceased "had tuberculosis of right lung." He further stated that the injured person would be able to resume his usual work in three weeks, or perhaps four. Medical witnesses introduced by appellant testified that from what was brought out in evidence they could not say definitely what was the cause of death, but that from the symptoms detailed the death could have been caused either by the accident, or by something not at all related to it, to wit, tuberculosis. It was further their opinion that, if death was caused by embolus, as stated by witnesses for appellee, then an autopsy would have disclosed that fact. This view is thus expressed by Dr. Ogden, witness for appellant:
"An embolus which is a blood clot floating in the blood vessel, stops up the blood vessel in the lung, of sufficient size to cause the patient to be blue and to cause death would leave this area of the lung perfectly recognizable at an autopsy, even though the embolus itself was not there, even though the embolus had been destroyed in the process of embalming, but the area of the lung involved by the embolus would still be recognizable."
On April 8, 1927, appellant served upon appellee a request, in writing, for autopsy upon the body of Rossi, so that the cause of death might be determined. To this request appellee apparently at first consented upon advice of counsel, but a day or two later the demand was refused. The insurance contract provides that:
"The Company shall have the right and opportunity to examine the person of the insured when and so often as it may reasonably require during the pendency of claim hereunder, and also the right and opportunity to make an autopsy in case of death where it is not forbidden by law."
Witnesses for appellee deny that an autopsy would probably disclose the cause of death, and counsel for appellee contend that the Statutes of Arkansas forbid the holding of an autopsy, at least without the consent of the widow, and that, in any event, the request came too late. The funeral was held, and deceased was placed in a receiving vault, on March 14, 1927. Apparently the first notice that appellant had of the death was on March 25, 1927, when the Union Trust Company, of Little Rock, acting for appellee, asked for blanks for making proof of a death claim under the policy. It will be remembered that the first report of the accident, made by the physician in charge, indicated that the injury was not of a serious character. The demand for autopsy was made within approximately two weeks after the application for blanks for making proof, and four weeks after the death. The Arkansas statute in question is section 2723 of Crawford & Moses' Digest, 1921, to wit:
The court held that the request for autopsy was not made within a reasonable time, and so instructed. Upon submission, the jury returned a verdict for appellee. In addition to the principal sum named in the policy, the court assessed damages, for failure to pay after demand made, in the sum of $900, and attorneys' fees in the further sum of $750. This action was taken under section 6155, Crawford & Moses' Digest, 1921, which provides:
The contentions of appellant are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woelfle v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.
... ... 215; ... Clancy v. Railroad, 192 Mo. 615; London ... Guarantee & Acc. Assn. v. Woelfle, 83 F.2d 325; ... Hickory v. United States, 151 U.S. 303; St ... Clair v ... Co. v. Siebert, 72 ... F.2d 6; Mass. Protective Ass'n v. Lewis, 72 F.2d ... 952; Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Rossi, 35 F.2d 667, ... 672; Acc. Ins. Co. v. Crandal, 120 U.S. 527, 533 ... ...
-
Rieger v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
... ... 362, 369; Johnson v ... Continental Casualty Co., 122 Mo.App. 369; Hooper v ... Standard Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 166 Mo.App. 209. (6) ... Plaintiffs' Instruction No. 2 correctly states the ... Accident Assn. v. Barry, 131 U.S. 100; Standard ... Accident Insurance Co. v. Rossi, 35 F.2d 667, (C. C. A ... 8); O'Brien v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., ... 64 F.2d 33 ... ...
-
Darling Shops of Tennessee v. Brack, 10880.
...2 Cir., 65 F.2d 344, 374; Turfitt v. Perales, 5 Cir., 63 F.2d 659; Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Rossi, 8 Cir., 52 F.2d 547, 548; Id., 8 Cir., 35 F.2d 667, 670; Euclid Candy Co. v. Bank, 6 Cir., 48 F.2d 757; Pullman Co. v. Bullard, 5 Cir., 44 F.2d 347; Axelrod v. Osage O. & R. Co., 8 Cir., 29 F......
-
Mandles v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America
...Insurance Company of America, 334 Pa. 143, 6 A.2d 55; Etna Life Ins. Co. v. Bethel, 140 Ky. 609, 131 S.W. 523; Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Rossi, 8 Cir., 35 F.2d 667; London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Leefson, 3 Cir., 37 F.2d 488; Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Dean, 5 Cir., 44 F.2d ......