Standard Home Co. v. Davis

Decision Date15 October 1914
Docket Number1819.
Citation217 F. 904
PartiesSTANDARD HOME CO. v. DAVIS, State Bank Com'r, et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas

[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

The plaintiff seeks to enjoin the enforcement of what is known as the 'blue sky law' of the state of Arkansas, enacted by the General Assembly of 1913, upon the ground of its unconstitutionality. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the plaintiff not asking for a temporary injunction. In order that the issues involved may be fully understood, a copy of the act, as approved March 28, 1913, is here set forth:

'An act to provide for the regulation and supervision of investment companies and to provide a penalty for the violation thereof.

'Be it enacted by the general assembly of the state of Arkansas:

'Section 1. Every individual, corporation, co-partnership or company, and every association (other than national banks and corporations not organized for profit) now, or which shall hereafter be organized in this state, whether incorporated or unincorporated, which shall sell or negotiate for the sale of any stock, contracts, bonds or other securities of any kind or character other than bonds of the United States, or of some municipality authorized to issue bonds of the state of Arkansas, and notes secured by mortgages on real estate located in the state of Arkansas or sell building stock or loan investments, or building investments to any person or persons in the state of Arkansas, other than those specifically exempted herein, shall be known for the purpose of this act as a domestic investment company. Every such investment company organized in any other state, territory or government, organized under the laws of any other state, territory or government, shall be known for the purpose of this act as a foreign investment company.
'Section 2. Before offering or attempting to sell any stock, contracts, bonds or other securities, building contracts, loan investments or other securities of any kind or character other than those specifically exempted in section 1 of this act to any person or persons, or transacting any business whatever in this state, except that of preparing the documents hereinafter required, every such investment company, domestic or foreign, now or hereafter doing business in this state shall file in the office of the insurance commissioner of this state, together with a filing fee of five dollars ($5.00), in addition to the fees now required of all corporations, the following document to wit:
'A statement showing in full detail the plan upon which it proposes to transact business. A copy of all contracts, bonds or other instruments which it proposes to make with or sell to its contributors. A statement which shall show the name and location of the investment company, and an itemized account of its actual financial condition and the amount of its property and liabilities, and such other information touching its affairs as said insurance commissioner may require. If such investment company shall be a copartnership or unincorporated association it shall also file with the insurance commissioner a copy of its articles of copartnership or association, and all other papers pertaining to its organization, and if it be a corporation organized under the laws of Arkansas it shall also file with the insurance commissioner a copy of its articles of incorporation, constitution and by-laws, and all other papers pertaining to its organization. If it shall be an investment company organized under the laws of any other state, territory or government, incorporated or unincorporated, it shall also file with said insurance commissioner a copy of the laws of such state, territory or government under which it exists or is incorporated, and also a copy of its charter, articles of incorporation, constitution and by-laws and all amendments thereof which have been made and all other papers pertaining to its organization.
'Section 3. The duties devolving upon the insurance commissioner under this act shall automatically pass to and become a part of the duties of the bank commissioner whenever that office shall be created in this state, and the fees provided for herein for the services of the insurance commissioner and his assistants shall also pass to the bank commissioner and his assistants to pay them for the time required in the performance of the duties set out in this act. Provided in no event shall this act be construed so as to increase the salary of the bank commissioner beyond that fixed by the act creating his office, nor shall this act increase the salary of the insurance commissioner, but in order to carry out the provisions of the act an assistant or deputy may be appointed at a salary of $1,800 a year, to be paid monthly in accordance with section 15 of this act, and said sum is hereby appropriated out of the fund mentioned in section 15 for said salary.
'Section 4. All of the above described papers shall be verified by oath, of a member of a copartnership or company, if it be a copartnership or company, or by the oath of a duly authorized officer, if it be an incorporated or unincorporated association. All such papers however, as are recorded or are on file in any public office shall be further certified to by the officer of whose records or archives they form a part, as being correct copies of such records or archives. The verification described in this section shall be made in the office of the insurance commissioner or bank commissioner as the case may be, and it will not be sufficient for the same to be made in the state where the company is domiciled and then mailed to the commissioner but where the individual, corporation, copartnership or company or association is a nonresident of this state, then the verification and filing must take place as described in this proviso. Provided further, that the verification and filing of papers as provided in this act may be mailed or otherwise sent to the commissioner where the individual, corporation, copartnership or company or association is a resident of the state.
'Section 5. Every foreign investment company shall also file its written consent, irrevocable that actions may be commenced against it, in the proper court of any county in this state in which a cause of action may arise, or in which the plaintiff may reside, by the service of process on the secretary of state, and stipulating and agreeing that such service of process on the secretary of state shall be taken and held, in all courts, to be as valid and binding as if due service had been made on the company itself, according to the laws of this state or any other state, and such instrument shall be authenticated by the seal of said foreign investment company and by the signature of a member of the copartnership or company, if it be a copartnership or company, or by the signatures of the president and secretary of the incorporated or unincorporated association, if it be an incorporated or unincorporated association, and shall be accompanied by a duly certified copy of the order or resolution of the board of directors, trustees or managers of the corporation authorizing the said secretary and president to execute the same. Whenever service of process is served on the secretary of state, he shall within twenty-four hours thereafter mail the same to the home of the company against whom the process is directed. The secretary of state is hereby commanded to register said summons and if within a reasonable time he does not receive a return card showing the same has been delivered, he shall register another letter to said company.

'Section 6. It shall be the duty of the insurance commissioner to examine the statements and documents so filed, and if said insurance commissioner shall deem it advisable he shall make or have made a detailed examination of such investment company's affairs, which examination shall be at the expense of such investment company, as hereinafter provided and if he find that such investment company is solvent, that its articles of incorporation or association, its constitution and by-laws, its proposed plan of business and proposed contract contain and provide for a fair, just and equitable plan for the transaction of business, and in his judgment promises a fair return on the stocks, bonds and other securities by it offered for sale, the insurance commissioner shall issue to such investment company a statement reciting that such company has complied with the provisions of this act, that detailed information in regard to the company and its securities is on file in the insurance commissioner's office for public inspection and information, that such investment company is permitted to do business in this state, and such statement shall also recite in bold type that the insurance commissioner in no wise recommends the securities to be offered for sale by such security company. But if said insurance commissioner finds that such articles of incorporation or association charter, constitution and by-laws, plan of business or proposed contract contain any provision that is unfair, unjust, inequitable or oppressive to any class of contributors, or if he decides from his examination of its affairs that said investment company is not solvent and does not intend to do a fair and honest business, and in his judgment does not promise a fair return on the stocks, bonds, or other securities by it offered for sale, then he shall notify such investment company in writing of his findings, and it shall be unlawful for such company to do any further business in this state until it shall so change its constitution and by-laws, articles of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Yarbrough v. W. A. Gage & Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Abril 1934
    ... ... it was subject to approval of defendant at its home office; ... said notes being dated at Steele, Missouri, and not made ... payable at any place ... business the whole contract is void. Parke-Davis & Co. v ... Mullett, 149 S.W. 461; Sawyer v. Sanderson, 113 ... Mo.App. 233; Gutta Percha ... A ... loan, being neither a sale or purchase, cannot be an ... interstate transaction. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, ... 217 F. 904. (6) Estoppel is no defense in this case. It is no ... defense ... ...
  • State v. Wolfner
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 4 Febrero 1928
    ... ... 492; State v ... Barrington, 198 Mo. 77; So. Pac. Ry. Co. v ... Lipman, 148 Cal. 480; Standard Quicksilver Co. v ... Habishaw, 132 Cal. 115; Chicago Ry. Co. v ... Bennett, 181 F. 799; Met ... S.W. 50; Neill v. Gates, 152 Mo. 594; State v ... Russell, 116 Mo. 255; Nalle v. Home Ins. Co., ... 250 Mo. 452; State ex rel. v. Kerns, 304 Mo. 707; ... Franklin v. Fire Ins. Co., 70 ... v. Bank, 207 U.S. 251; Mech ... B. & L. Assn. v. Coffman, 162 S.W. 1090; Home Co. v ... Davis, 217 F. 904; Re Girard, 200 P. 593; Ex parte ... Taylor, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 701; Ashley v. Rumelin, ... ...
  • Ashley & Rumelin, Bankers v. Brady
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 9 Julio 1925
    ... ... proof of fraud in securing the note will not defeat it unless ... notice thereof is brought home to the plaintiff. (First ... Nat. Bank v. Court, 183 Wis. 203, 197 N.W. 798.) ... Where ... v. Agey, 171 N.C. 831, 88 S.E. 726; Standard Home ... Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904.) ... In ... Edward v. Ioor, 205 Mich. 617, 172 N.W ... ...
  • N. R. Bagley Co., Inc. v. Cameron
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 5 Enero 1925
    ...federal District Courts, see Arkansas (Laws of 1913, p. 904), sustained by the United States District Court in Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904; California (Deerings Consol. Supp. to Codes and General Laws 1917-21, p. 1447), sustained by the California Supreme Court in People v. Simon......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT