Standard Oil Co. (Ind.) v. Williams
Decision Date | 17 October 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 1171A233,1171A233 |
Parties | STANDARD OIL COMPANY (INDIANA), The American Oil Company, a Maryland corporation, Defendants-Appellants, v. Robert O. WILLIAMS, Individually and as a Member of the Class Described in the Complaint, and on Behalf of all Members Thereof, Plaintiff-Appellee. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Alan W. Boyd, Thomas M. Scanlon, Robert P. Johnstone, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer & Boyd, Indianapolis, for defendants-appellants; Luke White, Covington, of counsel.
Ward S. Williams, Robert O. Williams, Covington, for plaintiff-appellee.
Harry T. Ice, James E. Hawes, Jr., Ice, Miller, Donadio & Ryan, Indianapolis, for amicus curiae Sears, Roebuck & Co.; Lewis D. Dellinger, Jr., Dellinger & Dellinger, Monticello, of counsel.
The plaintiff-appellee (Williams) is the holder of a credit card issued by the defendant-appellant (Standard). Williams filed a class action for recovery of certain monies paid to Standard, premised upon the theory that they constituted usury. In granting Williams' motion for partial summary judgment, the trial court held, inter alia: 'That the plaintiff and his class are entitled to recoup and recover the usurious interest charged by the defendants. . . .' This appeal ensues, with the threshold issue being whether the 1 1/2% 'Finance Charge' paid to Standard is usurious as defined by Indiana statutes.
American Oil Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Standard Oil Company (Indiana)) adopted a 'Revolving Charge Account Agreement', which reads:
'Buyer agrees with American Oil Company, (American), 165 North Canal Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60606, that all purchases charged under any American Oil Company Credit Card or supplemental card issued to buyer or at his request is indebtedness of buyer, which may be purchased or acquired by American.
'Buyer agrees to pay a FINANCE CHARGE computed by periodic rates of 1 1/2% per month applied to the first $500 of his previous balance after deducting current payments, credits, and past due insurance premiums, and 1% per month of his previous balance in excess of $500. such FINANCE CHARGE to become part of buyer's outstanding balance.
'1 1/2% per month is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. 1% per month is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 12%.
In addition, the credit card and sales slips reiterated the substance of the above quoted agreement.
Williams elected to defer payment thereby paying the 1 1/2% Finance Charge prior to the filing of this cause.
The legal basis for this case rests upon the following Indiana statutes:
'Legal rates of interest on loans or forbearances.--The interest on loans or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action, shall be as follows:
(a) When the parties do not agree on the rate, interest shall be at the rate of six dollars ($6.00) per year per one hundred dollars ($100);
(b) By agreement in writing signed by the party to be charged thereby, and not otherwise, any obligor other than a corporation may lawfully agree to pay any rate of interest not in excess of eight dollars ($8.00) per year per one hundred dollars ($100); * * *' IC 1971 24-5-1-1, Ind.Ann.Stat. § 19-12-101 (Burns 1964).
'Usurious rate of interest in contract--Debtor's recoupment.--When a greater rate of interest than is hereby allowed shall be contracted for, the contract shall be void as to the usurious interest contracted for; and, if it appears that interest at a higher rate than eight per cent (8%) has been, directly or indirectly, contracted for by an obligor other than a corporation, the excess of interest over six per cent (6%) shall be deemed usurious and illegal, and, in an action on a contract affected by such usury, the excess over the legal interest may be recouped by the debtor, whenever it has been reserved or paid before the bringing of the suit.' IC 1971, 24-5-1-4, Ind.Ann.Stat. § 19-12-104 (Burns 1964).
(Both statutes quoted have since been repealed by Acts 1971, P.L. 366 § 10(1)).
Williams further relies upon Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co. (1970), 48 Wis.2d 125, 179 N.W.2d 641, and Rollinger v. J. C. Penney Co. (1971), S.D., 192 N.W.2d 699. Both cases hold that under an agreement similar to the Revolving Charge Account Agreement in this case, the 1 1/2% amounts to forebearance and is, therefore, usurious.
Standard maintains the position that the 1 1/2% is a time-price differential which, under Indiana law, does not constitute usury. Hogg v. Ruffner (1861), 66 U.S. 115, 17 L.Ed. 38; NewKirk v. Burson and Others (1867), 28 Ind. 435; Stevens v. Grossman (1935), 100 Ind.App. 417, 196 N.E. 123; and Robrock v. Ditzler (1943), 113 Ind.App. 332, 47 N.E.2d 163.
A fair summary of the law upon which Standard relies, is contained in the Stevens case, supra, which reads:
(Citing authorities). 100 Ind.App. 417, 418, 196 N.E. 123, 124.
It is our opinion that Standard's position is legally correct and the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling as it did.
We are not unmindful of our duty to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fox v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
...of Banks (1965) 349 Mass. 283, 207 N.E.2d 906; Acker v. Provident Nat'l. Bank (3d Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 729; Standard Oil Co. v. Williams (1972) 153 Ind.App. 489, 288 N.E.2d 170). In my opinion, the conclusion reached in these cases is sound and is applicable ( We) also find that under the ev......
-
Cohen v. District of Columbia National Bank, Civ. A. No. 2110-69.
...304 A.2d 632 (D.C.1973). 33 Morris v. Capitol Furniture & Appliance Co., 280 A.2d 775 (D.C.1971). Accord, Standard Oil Company of Indiana v. Williams, 288 N.E.2d 170 (Ind.App.1972); Sliger v. R. H. Macy & Co., 59 N.J. 465, 283 A.2d 904 (1971); Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 223 Tenn. 415, ......
-
Cecil v. Allied Stores Corp.
...Homes, Inc. (1970), 13 Ariz.App. 371, 476 P.2d 892; 14 ALR3d 1077; Kass v. Garfinckel, (D.C.1973), 299 A.2d 542; Standard Oil Company v. Williams (Ind.App. 1972), 288 N.E.2d 170. However, the courts of a few states, while recognizing the time price doctrine, have held that finance charges a......
-
Overbeck v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
...District to uphold the legality of defendant American Oil Co.'s revolving charge account scheme in Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. Williams (1st Dist. 1972), 153 Ind.App. 489, 288 N.E.2d 170 (trans. den.), granted Sears' motion for summary judgment. Overbeck appeals, apparently under the mist......