Standard Water Sys. Co. of N.J. v. Ort
Decision Date | 15 May 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 61.,61. |
Citation | 166 A. 335 |
Parties | STANDARD WATER SYSTEMS CO. OF NEW JERSEY v. ORT. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Proceeding by the Standard Water Systems Company of New Jersey against Nettie A. Ort, individually, etc. From the judgment (160 A. 523, 10 N. J. Misc. 659), prosecutor appeals.
Reversed.
McCarter & English, of Newark (Herbert R. Baer, of Newark, of counsel), for appellant.
Gebhardt & Gebhardt, of Clinton (W. Reading Gebhardt, of Clinton, of counsel), for appellees.
The only question in this case is whether petitioner's decedent met his death by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Our examination of the competent proofs leads us to the conclusion that they do not sustain the action taken by the bureau or the Supreme Court.
The deceased was employed in shaping iron plates; the work requiring somewhat heavy lifting and the use of a sledge hammer. The work for the morning completed, without any unusual occurrence, he left the plant and started to walk home for lunch. Undoubtedly feeling unwell, he returned, asking to be driven home. While being driven in the foreman's car, he slumped in his sent and died the next day from a heart condition. There is nothing in the record to show that an accident occurred while the decedent was at work. Testimony by his widow that he said he guessed he must have hurt himself while at work is competent proof of nothing. The weight of medical testimony indicates that the petitioner's decedent died of angina pectoris.
The judgment is reversed.
For affirmance: None.
For reversal: The CHANCELLOR, the CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, and HEHER, and Judges VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, and WELLS—12.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Delille v. Holton-Seelye Co.
... ... 516, 165 N.E. 670; Eaton v ... Proctor, 159 A. 297; Standard Water Systems Co. v ... Ort, 166 A. 335; Wahlig v. Grocer Co., 29 ... ...
-
Simpson v. Seabd. Ice Co.
...do not hold to the same opinion as expounded by Dr. Yager. The respondent also urges that the case of Standard Water Systems Co. v. Ort, reported in 110 N.J.L. 586, 166 A. 335, is analogous to the instant case. I have carefully studied this case and am of the opinion that it is distinguisha......