Stanfield v. Neubaum
| Docket Number | 15-0387 |
| Decision Date | 24 June 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
87 cases
-
Harris Cnty. v. Coats
...of a duty proximately causes an injury if the breach is a cause in fact of the harm and the injury was foreseeable. Stanfield v. Neubaum , 494 S.W.3d 90, 97 (Tex. 2016) ; see Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas, Inc. v. Hogue , 271 S.W.3d 238, 246 (Tex. 2008). Here, the jury charge's proximat......
-
In re Capital One Consumer Data Sec. Breach Litig.
...Contr. Corp. , 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166, 414 N.E.2d 666, 670 (N.Y. 1980) (internal quotations omitted)); Stanfield v. Neubaum , 494 S.W.3d 90, 99 (Tex. 2016) ("An intervening cause supersedes the original negligence when it alters the natural sequence of events, causes injuries ......
-
Critical Path Res., Inc. v. Cuevas ex rel. Estate
...and the final injury such that the injury is attributed to the new cause rather than the first and more remote cause. Stanfield v. Neubaum , 494 S.W.3d 90, 97 (Tex. 2016) (citing Dew v. Crown Derrick Erectors, Inc. , 208 S.W.3d 448, 450 (Tex. 2006) (plurality op.)). A new and independent ca......
-
Easom v. US Well Servs., Inc.
...the final injury such that the injury is attributed to the new cause rather than the first and more remote cause.’ " Stanfield v. Neubaum , 494 S.W.3d 90, 97 (Tex. 2016) (alteration in original) (citation omitted). "In assessing whether an intervening cause disrupted the causal connection b......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 4-1 Legal Malpractice
...2008, pet. denied).[5] Starwood Mgt., LLC by and through Gonzalez v. Swaim, 530 S.W.3d 673, 678 (Tex. 2017); Stanfield v. Neubaum, 494 S.W.3d 90, 96 (Tex. 2016).[6] Barcelo v. Elliott, 923 S.W.2d 575, 577 (Tex. 1996).[7] Border Demolition & Envtl., Inc. v. Pineda, 535 S.W.3d 140, 152 (Tex. ......
-
Chapter 15-2 Superseding Cause (I.E., New, and Independent Cause)
...Establissement v. Amegy Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 525 S.W.3d 875, 880 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.).[10] Stanfield v. Neubaum, 494 S.W.3d 90, 97 (Tex. 2016) (quoting Dew v. Crown Derrick Erectors, Inc., 208 S.W.3d 448, 450 (Tex. 2006) (plurality op.).[11] Stanfield v. Neubaum, 494 ......
