Stanford v. United States, No. 16–454.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 196 L.Ed.2d 330,137 S.Ct. 453 (Mem) |
| Docket Number | No. 16–454. |
| Parties | Daniel James STANFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Decision Date | 07 November 2016 |
137 S.Ct. 453 (Mem)
196 L.Ed.2d 330
Daniel James STANFORD, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16–454.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 7, 2016.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 practice notes
-
Niles v. State, NO. PD–0234–17 & PD–0235–17
...error was considered harmless. See , e.g. , United States v. Stanford , 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 453, 196 L.Ed.2d 330 (2016) (discussing Neder ).We applied these rules in Olivas v. State , 202 S.W.3d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Structural (o......
-
Van Do v. State, 14-18-00600-CR
...harmless." Id. (citing United States v. Stanford , 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir.) (discussing Neder ), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 453, 196 L.Ed.2d 330 (2016) ).Regardless of which formulation of harmless error we use, we cannot conclude that the error here was harmless beyond a ......
-
Phi Van Do v. State, NO. 14-18-00600-CR
...the error was considered harmless." Id. (citing United States v. Stanford, 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir.) (discussing Neder), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 453 (2016)). Regardless of which formulation of harmless error we use, we cannot conclude that the error here was harmless beyond a reasonable......
-
Niles v. State, 14-15-00498-CR
...error was considered harmless. See, e.g., United States v. Stanford , 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 453, 196 L.Ed.2d 330 (2016) (discussing Neder ). Niles , 555 S.W.3d at 572.In following the Court of Criminal Appeals' directive, we should then ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Niles v. State, NO. PD–0234–17 & PD–0235–17
...error was considered harmless. See , e.g. , United States v. Stanford , 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 453, 196 L.Ed.2d 330 (2016) (discussing Neder ).We applied these rules in Olivas v. State , 202 S.W.3d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Structural (o......
-
Van Do v. State, 14-18-00600-CR
...harmless." Id. (citing United States v. Stanford , 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir.) (discussing Neder ), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 453, 196 L.Ed.2d 330 (2016) ).Regardless of which formulation of harmless error we use, we cannot conclude that the error here was harmless beyond a ......
-
Phi Van Do v. State, NO. 14-18-00600-CR
...the error was considered harmless." Id. (citing United States v. Stanford, 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir.) (discussing Neder), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 453 (2016)). Regardless of which formulation of harmless error we use, we cannot conclude that the error here was harmless beyond a reasonable......
-
Niles v. State, 14-15-00498-CR
...error was considered harmless. See, e.g., United States v. Stanford , 823 F.3d 814, 832 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 453, 196 L.Ed.2d 330 (2016) (discussing Neder ). Niles , 555 S.W.3d at 572.In following the Court of Criminal Appeals' directive, we should then ......
Request a trial to view additional results