Stanton Carter v. Robert Claughry

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtFuller
CitationStanton Carter v. Robert Claughry, 183 U.S. 365, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236 (1902)
Decision Date06 January 1902
Docket NumberNo. 251,251
PartiesI. STANTON CARTER (on Behalf of Oberlin M. Carter), Appt. , v. ROBERT W. McCLAUGHRY, Warden of the United States Penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
191 cases
  • Larrabee v. Del Toro
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • August 2, 2022
    ...trial by court-martial for offenses committed during such imprisonment." Id. at 7–8, 41 S.Ct. 224 (citing Carter v. McClaughry , 183 U.S. 365, 383, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236 (1902) ). The prisoners had a legal relationship with the armed forces, even if involuntary, because they were "mili......
  • Kelly v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • January 7, 1919
    ... ... booth, of Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs in error ... Robert ... W. Childs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen ... Before ... WARRINGTON ... Without repeating the ... discussion, we need but refer to Carter v ... McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365 (22 Sup.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed ... 236); ... ...
  • Yamashita Yamashita v. Styer
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1946
    ...5, 81, 15 L.Ed. 838; Runkle v. United States, 122 U.S. 543, 555, 556, 7 S.Ct. 1141, 1145, 1146, 30 L.Ed. 1167; Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236; Collins v. McDonald, 258 U.S. 416, 42 S.Ct. 326, 66 L.Ed. 692. Cf. Matter of Moran, 203 U.S. 96, 105, 27 S.Ct. 25, 2......
  • United States v. Skillman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 30, 1971
    ...226, 228, 57 L.Ed. 450. And the plea of double jeopardy is no defense to a conviction for both offenses. Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 395 22 S.Ct. 181, 193, 46 L.Ed. 236. It is only an identity of offenses which is fatal. See Gavieres v. United States, 220 U.S. 338, 342 31 S.Ct. 421,......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles