Stanton Carter v. Robert Claughry
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Fuller |
| Citation | Stanton Carter v. Robert Claughry, 183 U.S. 365, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236 (1902) |
| Decision Date | 06 January 1902 |
| Docket Number | No. 251,251 |
| Parties | I. STANTON CARTER (on Behalf of Oberlin M. Carter), Appt. , v. ROBERT W. McCLAUGHRY, Warden of the United States Penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
191 cases
-
Larrabee v. Del Toro
...trial by court-martial for offenses committed during such imprisonment." Id. at 7–8, 41 S.Ct. 224 (citing Carter v. McClaughry , 183 U.S. 365, 383, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236 (1902) ). The prisoners had a legal relationship with the armed forces, even if involuntary, because they were "mili......
-
Kelly v. United States
... ... booth, of Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs in error ... Robert ... W. Childs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen ... Before ... WARRINGTON ... Without repeating the ... discussion, we need but refer to Carter v ... McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365 (22 Sup.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed ... 236); ... ...
-
Yamashita Yamashita v. Styer
...5, 81, 15 L.Ed. 838; Runkle v. United States, 122 U.S. 543, 555, 556, 7 S.Ct. 1141, 1145, 1146, 30 L.Ed. 1167; Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236; Collins v. McDonald, 258 U.S. 416, 42 S.Ct. 326, 66 L.Ed. 692. Cf. Matter of Moran, 203 U.S. 96, 105, 27 S.Ct. 25, 2......
-
United States v. Skillman
...226, 228, 57 L.Ed. 450. And the plea of double jeopardy is no defense to a conviction for both offenses. Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 395 22 S.Ct. 181, 193, 46 L.Ed. 236. It is only an identity of offenses which is fatal. See Gavieres v. United States, 220 U.S. 338, 342 31 S.Ct. 421,......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Why are non-unanimous (court-martial) guilty verdicts still alive after ramos?
...instance of the Court remarking on the “separate” community theory of military criminal jurisdiction appears to be Carter v. McClaughry , 183 U.S. 365 (1902). Carter addressed the president’s power to review and, at his discretion, approve the court-martial findings and sentence of dismiss......
-
The Supreme Court's Role in Defining the Jurisdiction of Military Tribunals: A Study, Critique, & Proposal for Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
...of judicial review: Mullan v. United States, 212 U.S. 516, 520 (1909); Bishop v. United States, 197 U.S. 334, 342 (1905); Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 380 (1902); Carter v. Roberts 177 U.S. 496, 498 (1900); Swaim v. United States, 165 U.S. 553, 555 (1897); United States v. Fletcher, ......