Stark-Davis Co. v. Wilson

Decision Date14 September 1926
Citation248 P. 1095,119 Or. 308
PartiesSTARK-DAVIS CO. v. WILSON ET AL.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

In Bank.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; George Rossman, Judge.

Suit by the Stark-Davis Company against Wilbert B. Wilson and others to establish and foreclose a mechanic's lien. From an order dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Decree set aside, and decree entered in favor of plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Stark-Davis Company, a corporation, has appealed from an order of the circuit court decreeing the dismissal of its complaint upon the ground that a certain lien claim filed by plaintiff was not filed within 60 days from the time of the completion of its contract. The lien in question was a mechanic's lien for $150, filed by plaintiff on June 30 1925, on a dwelling house situate on lot 4, block 1, New York addition to the city of Portland, arising out of a contract made by it with Wilbert B. Wilson, the owner of the house for furnishing and installing a furnace, "together with all necessary pipes and equipment to make a complete warm-air heating system." Thereafter plaintiff brought suit to foreclose the lien. The complaint prays for a decree against defendant Wilbert B. Wilson for $150, for $75 as attorney's fees, for the further sum of $1.25 paid for recording the lien, for costs and disbursements, and that the lien may be foreclosed.

W. Y. Masters, of Portland, for appellant.

F. M Phelps and Wilbur, Beckett, Howell & Oppenheimer, all of Portland, for respondents.

BROWN J. (after stating the facts as above).

After the construction of the building, but prior to the filing of the lien, the property was transferred to the defendant H. E. Noble, who died during the pendency of this cause, and whose legal representatives and heirs have been duly substituted as defendants herein. The defendants assert that the lien was filed too late to be enforced.

Every original contractor who claims the benefit of the statute providing for a lien shall file his claim for such lien within 60 days after the completion of his contract. Or. L. § 10195. It follows that, in order to decide this cause, we are required to determine the date of the completion of the contract. At the time of making the contract involved herein the Stark-Davis Company had in stock furnaces which failed to comply with the requirements of the building code of the city of Portland, and knowingly installed one of these furnaces in the Wilson dwelling house; the work of installation being completed on or about April 4, 1925. A representative of the building department of the city of Portland inspected the furnace, and on April 22, 1925, notified the company that they must replace the same. Defendant Wilson gave a like notice. On May 2, 1925, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Shea v. Graves
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 28 February 1933
    ... ... on March 5, 1928, convinces us that the plumbing was not ... finished until that time. Stark-Davis Co. v. Wilson, ... 119 Or. 308, 248 P. 1095; Eastern & Western Lbr. Co. v ... Williams, 129 Or. 1, 276 P. 257 ... ...
  • Christenson v. Behrens
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 20 June 1962
    ...such as the one at bar in which the interests of an innocent owner may be affected by the purported lien. See Stark-Davis Co. v. Wilson, 119 Or. 308, 248 P. 1095; Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic Bishop, 107 Or. 557, 215 P. 178; Sarchet v. Legg, 60 Or. 213, 118 P. 203; and Crane Co. v. Ellis, 58......
  • Farrell v. Lacey
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 23 February 1973
    ...the time such additions are made * * *.' Avery v. Butler, 30 Or. 287, 293, 47 P. 706, 708 (1897). See also, Stark-Davis Co. v. Wilson et al, 119 Or. 308, 311, 248 P. 1095 (1926), and Shea v. Graves, 142 Or. 503, 511, 19 P.2d 406 (1933) (where owners moved in before the plumbing was The sump......
  • Harrison v. Stouffer
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 27 April 1949
    ... ... lien by performing a trifling amount of labor after the ... parties considered their contract completed. Stark-Davis ... Co. v. Wilson, 119 Or. 308, 248 P. 1095. This is ... especially true where there has been an unnecessary and ... unexplained lapse of time ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT