Starkweather v. Johnson

Decision Date21 September 1886
PartiesSTARKWEATHER v. JOHNSON.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Ashland county.

This action was commenced in the circuit court for Portage county, and upon issue joined a trial was had, and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff, which was set aside on motion of the defendant. Upon application of the defendant, and an affidavit of prejudice of the judge, the venue was ordered to be changed to the circuit court for Ashland county, October 5, 1885. That order was filed on that day with the clerk of the circuit court for Portage county, who on the same day, under the seal of the court, certified to the papers and records in the cause, and that they were then “transmitted to the circuit court of Ashland county.” The plaintiff's attorney testified that he paid the clerk's fees on the same day. As a matter of fact, the papers were not put in the express office to be carried to Ashland until October 28, 1885, and did not reach Ashland until October 30, 1885; and said clerk testified that his fees for such transmission were not paid until October 27, 1885. December 17, 1885, the plaintiff's attorneys served notice of trial of said cause in the circuit court for Ashland county, at the January term thereof for 1886, which service was admitted by the written indorsement of the defendant's attorneys thereon. December 19, 1885, the defendant's attorneys served on the plaintiff's attorney a proposed verified amendment to the answer, based upon the records, papers, and affidavits, with notice of a motion for leave to so amend such answer, to be made in the circuit court for Ashland county at the January term thereof for 1886, which motion papers were entitled in said last-mentioned court. December 19, 1885, the defendant's attorneys also served on the plaintiff's attorney a written notice, offering to allow the plaintiff to take judgment in said action against the defendant for $36, and interest thereon from the date of the contract described in the complaint, together with costs of suit, which notice was entitled in the circuit court for Ashland county. January 19, 1886, the defendant's attorneys objected to the trial of said cause by that court, and moved the circuit court for Ashland county for an order striking the cause from the calendar, and for the return of the papers therein to the clerk of the circuit court of Portage county, for want of jurisdiction, and because the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Bonnell v. Chi., St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 1914
    ...123 N. W. 152;Shafer v. Eau Claire, 105 Wis. 239, 81 N. W. 409. See, also, Maxwell v. Kennedy, 50 Wis. 645, 7 N. W. 657;Starkweather v. Johnsen, 66 Wis. 469, 29 N. W. 284;Kayser v. Hartnett, 67 Wis. 254, 30 N. W. 363. [2] It is true that in Becker v. Holm, 100 Wis. 281, 75 N. W. 999, an ord......
  • Swan v. Porter
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 30 Abril 1897
    ...64 Wis. 408, 25 N. W. 206. Such failure to transmit the papers, however, is an irregularity which may be waived. Starkweather v. Johnsen, 66 Wis. 469, 29 N. W. 284. It is contended that the fact that the defendant so stipulated for such change of venue, and then appeared in the county court......
  • Ferance v. Roemer
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 21 Septiembre 1886

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT