Starr v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
| Docket Number | 09-55233 |
| Decision Date | 25 July 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7056 cases
-
Quiroga v. Graves
...of his federal rights.Lemire v. California Dep't of Corr. and Rehab., 726 F.3d 1062, 1074-75 (9th Cir. 2013); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1205-08 (9th Cir. 2011). A. Due Process Claim - Fourteenth Amendment When a detainee challenges some aspect of his pretrial detention that is not alleg......
-
Mendez v. United States
...at 676-77; Lemire, 726 F.3d at 1074-75; Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 915-16 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1205-08 (9th Cir. 2011). As previously found (ECF No. 11), Plaintiff's allegations suffice to establish a serious medical need. The Court previousl......
-
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.
...is an equally plausible interpretation in Plaintiffs' favor means that Plaintiffs survive a 12(b)(6) challenge. See Starr v. Baca , 652 F.3d 1202, 1216 (9th Cir. 2011) (noting that, "[i]f there are two alternative explanations, one advanced by defendant and the other advanced by plaintiff, ......
-
Demonte v. Griffith
...of his federal rights. Lemire v. California Dep't of Corr. and Rehab., 726 F.3d 1062, 1074-75 (9th Cir. 2013); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1205-08 (9th Cir. 2011). Plaintiff's allegations must demonstrate that each defendant personally participated in the deprivation of his rights. Jones ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
This Week At The Ninth: Deceptive Financial Advisory Services And Religious Speech
...by plaintiff, both of which are plausible, plaintiff's complaint survives a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).' Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1216 (9th Cir. Because Plaintiff met her pleading burden on both her claims, the Court then considered whether the District had satisfied strict ......
9 books & journal articles
-
Pleading
...have been raised, however, as to Swierkiewicz’s continued viability in light of Twombly and Iqbal .”); see also Starr v. Baca , 652 F.3d 1202, 1215 (9th Cir. 2011) Pleading factual matter well in excess of “a short and plain statement of the claim” is a good idea not only because of Iqbal/T......
-
Prisoners' Rights
...because supervisors aware of official’s record of discrimination toward and force against African-American prisoners); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1204-05, 1208 (9th Cir. 2011) (8th Amendment claim where deputy yelled at and kicked prisoner, resulting in pain, bleeding, and broken nose, ......
-
XI. Liability of Supervisors
...Cnty., 693 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc); L.L. Nelson Enters. v. City of St. Louis, 673 F.3d 799 (8th Cir. 2012); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011); Dodds v. Richardson, 614 F.3d 1185 (10th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 2150 (2011); T.E. v. Grindle, 599 F.3d 583. ...
-
16-c-6 What to File
...(quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949-50, 173 L. Ed. 2d 868, 884 (2009))); see also Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1215-16 (9th Cir. 2011) (examining Twombly, Erickson, and Iqbal and finding two common principles: "[f]irst, to be entitled to the presumption ......
Get Started for Free