State by State Highway Commissioner v. Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc.

Decision Date31 July 1957
Docket NumberNo. A--326,A--326
Citation46 N.J.Super. 125,134 A.2d 113
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, by STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HUDSON CIRCLE SERVICE CENTER, Inc., a corporation of New Jersey, et al., Defendants-Appellants. . Appellate Division
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Robert W. Moncrief, Newark, argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

Christian Bollermann, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Grover C. Richman, Jr., Atty. Gen., attorney).

Before Judges HUGHES, PRICE and COOLAHAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

By this appeal defendant-appellant, Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., a corporation of New Jersey, owner of the property which was acquired by plaintiff by eminent domain by virtue of N.J.S.A. 27:1--1 et seq., seeks to set aside a judgment in the Superior Court, Law Division, entered on the verdict of a jury on a trial De novo on appeal from the award of condemnation commissioners. The subject matter of the litigation had its origin in a complaint filed by plaintiff seeking the appointment of commissioners to determine the compensation to be paid for the taking of the land and premises in question, including the damage, if any, to remaining property of defendant as the result of the taking. The property is located in the Town of Kearny, Hudson County, New Jersey. The award of the commissioners was $223,500. Both plaintiff and defendant appealed from the commissioners' award. A trial De novo was held and judgment entered on the verdict of the jury in the Superior Court in the sum of $168,200. This is the judgment which defendant seeks to set aside by reason of alleged errors of the trial judge in refusing to admit certain proffered testimony.

The land acquired involved two parcels, one of 1.279 acres and the other of 0.701 acres, respectively, out of a total area of approximately 20 acres owned by defendant.

Part of the premises acquired was leased to Jersey Truck Center, a partnership owned by brothers of one Myron G. Auerbach, an officer and stockholder of Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., aforesaid. The lease was for 21 years from April 30, 1948, at a rental of $7,200 per annum, payable in equal monthly installments of $600. The lease provided that the leased premises were 'to be used and occupied for a gasoline and service station * * *.' Paragraph 26 of the lease was as follows:

'Paragraph 26. It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto that the agreement executed by them dated April 30, 1948 regarding the purchase of gasoline for the said premises herein leased shall be made a part and parcel of this lease and shall be subject to all the terms, conditions and covenants hereunder.'

As set forth in the appendix the attachment reads as follows:

'The parties hereto specifically agree that the rent and other charges reserved herein to be paid by the Tenant to the Landlord is essentially a consideration of and is predicated upon the due full, complete and faithful compliance by the Tenant of all the terms of the following clause:

'In consideration of the execution of the within lease and in order to induce the Landlord to sublet the demised premises to the Tenant herein at the rent reserved herein to be paid by the Tenant, the Tenant does hereby covenant and agree that for and during the entire term of the 21 years from the date hereof, the said Tenant will not, nor permit anyone else to store, handle, sell, offer for sale, advertise for sale; use or permit to be used upon the demised premises; any part thereof or adjacent thereto, any gasoline, oil, petroleum products, automotive equipment, accessories, electrical equipment or any other merchandise of whatsoever nature, kind or description other than that supplied by Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., of No. 51 Lexington Avenue, New York City.

'It is further understood and agreed that the said Tenant shall purchase and acquire from the said Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., all his requirements of gasoline, oil, petroleum products, automotive equipment, accessories, electrical equipment or any other merchandise of whatever kind, nature or description which is to be used, stored, handled, sold, offered for sale, advertised for sale upon the demised premises, or any part thereof, or adjacent thereto and that the said Tenant hereby agrees to pay unto the said Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., for such gasoline (upon delivery) the 'posted tank wagon price' of the major owner or supplier of the brand of gasoline delivered as aforesaid at the time of such delivery, and for oil, petroleum products, automotive equipment, accessories, electrical equipment or any other merchandise of whatsoever kind, nature or description so purchased at the same price for which the major owner or supplier of that branded article sells the same products to similar service stations in the immediate vicinity of the within property. The said Tenant shall at no time, post or display or advertise at, in or about the said demised premises any other selling price of gasoline other than that fixed by the said Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., it being understood that the said Tenant will accept such brand of gasoline as the said Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., shall designate, which brand said Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., may change from time to time.

'When the word 'Tenant' is used in the above clause it shall mean and is understood by all parties to mean the Tenant, his heirs, servants, legal representatives, assigns, sub-tenants, undertenants, or those claiming under or by virtue of them.

'When the name 'Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc.,' is used in the above clause, it shall mean and is understood by all parties hereto to mean his assignees, legal representatives, or any person, firm or corporation designated by it.

'Upon the breach of any of the terms or part or portion of the terms set forth in the within clause or if for any reason whatsoever the Tenant fails to comply or is prevented from complying with all the terms, covenants and conditions of this clause on its part to be performed, then and in that event, in addition to all legal or equitable remedies or other relief that the Landlord may be entitled to, the Tenant agrees to pay unto the Landlord, in addition * * * a sum equal to two (2cents) cents per gallon on each and every gallon of gasoline delivered to the demised premises during each and every month of the term of twenty-one years from date, two (2cents) cents per gallon to be paid monthly together with the other item of rent set forth with the same force and effect hereinafter as if originally by the terms of the lease agreement, the rent reserved therein to be paid by the Tenant to the Landlord consisted of (a) $600 per month, (b) Premiums from liability and plate glass insurance, (c) two cents (2cents) per gallon on each and every gallon of gasoline delivered to the demised premises, payable monthly.'

One Riley H. Marshall, a witness on behalf of defendant, testified that he had been with The Texas Company for 24 years; that it dealt in petroleum products; that its gasoline had the brand name of 'Texaco'; that he presently was district manager for the company in Linden, New Jersey, and had supervisory authority with reference to the leasing of gas stations for the company and that recommendations as to rents to be paid by the company stemmed from his office; that his department, in determining the suggested rent his company would pay for a station, first arrived at an estimated gallonage of the site and, to translate that into a definite rental, a factor was applied which he referred to as 'more or less a rule of thumb formula'; that the objective was to secure as low a rent as possible but, he said, 'we usually go up to two cents a gallon.' This testimony was the subject of objection. It and other proffered testimony to which reference is hereinafter made was presented on the theory that the amount of money paid as rent on...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Riddle v. State Highway Commission
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 16 Mayo 1959
    ...on (Troy Housing Authority v. Clemente Brothers, Inc., 4 A.D.2d 804, 164 N.Y.S.2d 555). In State by State Highway Com'r v. Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., 46 N.J.Super. 125, 134 A.2d 113, it was 'The court in the [City of Trenton v.] Lenzner case [16 N.J. 465, 109 A.2d 409] noted initia......
  • City and County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • 9 Julio 1965
    ...may or may not be competent, depending upon the particular facts of the case.' Cf., State, by State Highway Com'r. v. Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., 46 N.J.Super. 125, 134 A.2d 113; Cook v. New York Elevated R. R., 144 N.Y. 115, 39 N.E. Certainly, when one of the potential uses of the ......
  • State, by Com'r of Transp. v. Sun Oil Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 8 Junio 1978
    ...the Appellate Division has said that gallonage is a factor to be considered in a proper setting, State v. Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., 46 N.J.Super. 125, 134 A.2d 113 (1957), it has warned that gallonage must be used with great caution. See Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. Englewood Cl......
  • Port of New York Authority v. Howell
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 27 Julio 1961
    ...on the Howell tract. Appellants suggest in their brief that our opinion in State, by State Highway Com'r v. Hudson Circle Service Center, Inc., 46 N.J.Super. 125, 134 A.2d 113 (App.Div.1957), supports their position as recognizing 'the probative value of capitalization.' Not so. We were the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT