State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Decision Date | 12 June 1987 |
Docket Number | No. 86-7477,86-7477 |
Parties | STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Frank Evans, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Marianne D. Smith, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
On Appeal from the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs.
Before FLETCHER, BEEZER and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
By a majority vote of the panel members the memorandum disposition filed April 10, 1987, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Beezer. Attached is the opinion.
State Compensation Insurance Fund, Longshoremen and Harbor Workers' Compensation Fund, and Marcel Garrigues [hereafter collectively referred to as Garrigues] appeal the Benefits Review Board's decision that their obligation to pay disability benefits to Donald Watts is not limited to 104 weeks under 33 U.S.C. 908(f). Watts, a functional illiterate, sustained permanent back injuries while working for Garrigues as a longshoreman.
Garrigues claims that Watts' illiteracy constitutes a preexisting permanent partial disability. Where an employee suffering from a permanent partial disability becomes further disabled on the job, his employer pays disability benefits for a specified period, after which the Special Fund assumes payment. Because Garrigues did not offer substantial evidence that Watts' illiteracy is due to mental retardation or a learning disability, we affirm.
Donald Watts suffered a serious back injury while working as a longshoreman in 1978. The administrative law judge determined that Watts was totally and permanently disabled under 33 U.S.C. Sec. 901 et seq. Watts is also illiterate.
The ALJ determined that Watts' illiteracy was a manifest, preexisting and permanent partial disability, and that Garrigues was liable only for 104 weeks of disability payments. All subsequent benefits were to be paid out of the Special Fund Congress established in 33 U.S.C. Sec. 944. See 33 U.S.C. Sec. 908(f). 1 The Board held that the ALJ's determination that illiteracy was a preexisting permanent partial disability was not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The Board held that Garrigues, and not the Special Fund, was liable for disability payments after 104 weeks. Garrigues appeals.
This court has jurisdiction over appeals from the Benefits Review Board under 33 U.S.C. Sec. 921(c).
Todd Shipyards v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation, 792 F.2d 1489, 1491 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted).
Section 908(c) lists various disabilities and corresponding compensation levels. "Disability" under section 908(f) is not limited to cases listed in Sec. 908(c):
" 'Disability' in [Sec. 908(f) ] is necessarily of sufficient breadth to encompass those cases ... wherein the employee had such a serious physical disability in fact that a cautious employer would have been motivated to discharge the handicapped employee because of a greatly increased risk of employment-related accident and compensation liability."
Director, Etc. v. Campbell Indus., Inc., 678 F.2d 836 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting C & P Tel. Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation, 564 F.2d 503, 513 (D.C.Cir.1977)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1104, 103 S.Ct. 726, 74 L.Ed.2d 951 (1983) (emphasis in original).
Illiteracy may be due to mental retardation, learning disability, or lack of education. Mental retardation and learning disabilities are permanent, irrevocable reductions in individual capability. Illiteracy due to lack of education is not irrevocable.
The Board has held that mental impairment qualifies as a permanent partial disability under Sec. 8(f). Connonetz v. Pacific Fisherman, Inc., 11 BRBS 175, 178 (1979); Collins v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 9 BRBS 1015, 1023 (1979). These same cases state that lack of education is not a mental impairment or disability within the meaning of Sec. 8(f).
Proof of illiteracy, by itself, does not establish a preexisting permanent partial disability. In order to invoke the benefits of Sec. 8(f), an employer must show that the employee's illiteracy is due to something else, such as mental retardation or a learning disability.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
White v. Peterson Boatbuilding Co.
... ... /Carrier-Petitioners Cross-Respondents DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ... Programs, United States Department of Labor ... we turn to the state courts for guidance and examine how ... employer to the Special Fund established in Section 44 of the ... Act, ... ...
-
Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 89-70084
...not been substantially lower than normal." Jones, 426 F.2d at 1266; see also State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 818 F.2d 1424, 1426 (9th Cir.1987) (mental retardation and learning disabilities can constitute pre-existing permanent partial dis......
-
Second Injury Fund, State of Tex. v. Conrad
...that, when coupled with the congenital defect, caused the employee to be unemployable); cf. State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Director, Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, 818 F.2d 1424, 1426 (9th Cir.1987) (holding that illiteracy is not considered a congenital defect because it is reversible and te......
-
Nevarez v. McDermott, Inc.
... ... Counsel for Longshore), for the Director, Office of ... Workers’ Compensation ... 104 weeks from the employer to the Special Fund ... established in Section 44 of the Act, ... sub nom ... Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Mikell, 14 F.3d 58 (11th Cir ... (1986), aff’d sub nom. State Compensation Ins. Fund ... v. Director, ... ...
-
Table of Cases
...49 CCC 577, 12 CWCR 247 (W/D-1984), §11:35 SCIF v. Brown, 32 CA4th 188, 60 CCC 91 (1995), §§3:72, 3:73 SCIF v. Director (Watts ), 818 F2d 1424 (9th Cir. 1987), §8:163 – SC – California Workers’ Compensation A-108 SCIF v. IAC (Ambriz), 31 CCC 165 (W/D-1966), §3:40 SCIF v. IAC (Dean), 73 CA2d......
-
Permanent disability
...for purposes of the federal equivalent to the Subsequent Injuries Fund legislation. [33 USC 908(f)(1). SCIF v. Director (Watts ) , 818 F2d 1424 (9th Cir. 1987).] The pre-existing disability must be more than merely speculative. An injured worker failed to carry her burden of proof of establ......