State Corporation Commission of Kansas v. Arrow Transportation Co Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co v. Arrow Transportation Co Interstate Commerce Commission v. Arrow Transportation Co, Nos. 526

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation80 S.Ct. 406,361 U.S. 353,4 L.Ed.2d 362
Docket NumberNos. 526,527 and 528
PartiesSTATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS et al., appellants, v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. et al.; ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO. et al., appellants, v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. et al.; and INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, appellant, v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. et al
Decision Date18 January 1960

361 U.S. 353
80 S.Ct. 406
4 L.Ed.2d 362
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS et al., appellants,

v.

ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. et al.; ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO. et al., appellants, v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. et al.; and INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, appellant, v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. et al.

Nos. 526, 527 and 528.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 18, 1960

Mr. Byron M. Gray, for appellants in No. 526.

Messrs. R. W. Henriott and M. L. Cassell, for appellants in No. 527.

Messrs. Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay, for appellant in No. 528.

Messrs. MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, Donald Macleay, George Shuff, John A. Caddell and Charles J. McCarthy, for appellees.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 practice notes
  • Richmond v. Lewis, No. 86-2382
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • January 14, 1992
    ...467, 497, 341 P.2d 679, 699 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 925, 80 S.Ct. 296, 4 L.Ed.2d 241, reh'g denied, 361 U.S. 941, 80 S.Ct. 383, 4 L.Ed.2d 362 (1960). Finally, we note the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Harrison v. United States, 392 U.S. 219, 221 n. 4, 88 S.Ct. 2008, ......
  • Arrow Transportation Company v. Southern Railway Company, No. 430
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • April 15, 1963
    ...Co. v. United States, 176 F.Supp. 411, 416 (D.C.N.D.Ala.), aff'd per curiam sub nom. State Corporation Comm'n v. Arrow Transportation Co., 361 U.S. 353, 80 S.Ct. 406, 4 L.Ed.2d 362. 1. We note that on January 21, 1963, while the case was pending here, the Division of the Commission which ha......
  • Anderson, In re, Cr. 11572
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • November 18, 1968
    ...Cal.2d 467, 498--499, 341 P.2d 679, cert den. 361 U.S. 925, 80 S.Ct. 296, 4 L.Ed.2d 241; pet. for reh. den. 361 U.S. 941, 80 S.Ct. 383, 4 L.Ed.2d 362. There the defendant was detained pending execution of sentence of death for more than 11 years during which period various matters of which ......
  • Handy v. Union Pacific R. Co., No. 900638-CA
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • November 12, 1992
    ...the employer's fault." Southern Pac. Co. v. Hendricks, 339 P.2d 731, 733 (Ariz.1959), cert. dismissed, 361 U.S. 941, 80 S.Ct. 385, 4 L.Ed.2d 362 (1960). Two exceptions to the general rule (1) when an employee, to the employer's knowledge, becomes so seriously ill while at work as to render ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Richmond v. Lewis, No. 86-2382
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • January 14, 1992
    ...467, 497, 341 P.2d 679, 699 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 925, 80 S.Ct. 296, 4 L.Ed.2d 241, reh'g denied, 361 U.S. 941, 80 S.Ct. 383, 4 L.Ed.2d 362 (1960). Finally, we note the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Harrison v. United States, 392 U.S. 219, 221 n. 4, 88 S.Ct. 2008, ......
  • Arrow Transportation Company v. Southern Railway Company, No. 430
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • April 15, 1963
    ...Co. v. United States, 176 F.Supp. 411, 416 (D.C.N.D.Ala.), aff'd per curiam sub nom. State Corporation Comm'n v. Arrow Transportation Co., 361 U.S. 353, 80 S.Ct. 406, 4 L.Ed.2d 362. 1. We note that on January 21, 1963, while the case was pending here, the Division of the Commission which ha......
  • Anderson, In re, Cr. 11572
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • November 18, 1968
    ...Cal.2d 467, 498--499, 341 P.2d 679, cert den. 361 U.S. 925, 80 S.Ct. 296, 4 L.Ed.2d 241; pet. for reh. den. 361 U.S. 941, 80 S.Ct. 383, 4 L.Ed.2d 362. There the defendant was detained pending execution of sentence of death for more than 11 years during which period various matters of which ......
  • Handy v. Union Pacific R. Co., No. 900638-CA
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • November 12, 1992
    ...the employer's fault." Southern Pac. Co. v. Hendricks, 339 P.2d 731, 733 (Ariz.1959), cert. dismissed, 361 U.S. 941, 80 S.Ct. 385, 4 L.Ed.2d 362 (1960). Two exceptions to the general rule (1) when an employee, to the employer's knowledge, becomes so seriously ill while at work as to re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT