State ex rel. Atkins v. State, No. 2016–KH–1082

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
Citation227 So.3d 251 (Mem)
Parties STATE EX REL. Justin Terrell ATKINS v. STATE of Louisiana
Decision Date29 September 2017
Docket NumberNo. 2016–KH–1082

227 So.3d 251 (Mem)

STATE EX REL. Justin Terrell ATKINS
v.
STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016–KH–1082

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 29, 2017


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF OUACHITA

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator inexcusably failed to raise his claims in the proceedings leading to conviction. La.C.Cr.P. art 930.4(B). In addition, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Atkins v. Hooper, No. 19-30018
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...default was one of the grounds on which the Louisiana Supreme Court denied state habeas relief. State ex rel. Atkins v. State , 227 So. 3d 251, 251 (La. 2017). Nevertheless, the State failed to do so at the district court, and Atkins now contends the State waived procedural default because ......
  • Justin Terrell Atkins La Doc v. Hooper, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1544
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Louisiana
    • November 19, 2018
    ...remedial writ, which the Louisiana Supreme Court denied on September 29, 2017. State ex rel. Atkins v. State, 2016-1082 (La. 9/29/17), 227 So. 3d 251. In its per curiam opinion, the Louisiana Supreme Court found that Atkins had fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in s......
2 cases
  • Atkins v. Hooper, No. 19-30018
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...default was one of the grounds on which the Louisiana Supreme Court denied state habeas relief. State ex rel. Atkins v. State , 227 So. 3d 251, 251 (La. 2017). Nevertheless, the State failed to do so at the district court, and Atkins now contends the State waived procedural default because ......
  • Justin Terrell Atkins La Doc v. Hooper, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1544
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Louisiana
    • November 19, 2018
    ...remedial writ, which the Louisiana Supreme Court denied on September 29, 2017. State ex rel. Atkins v. State, 2016-1082 (La. 9/29/17), 227 So. 3d 251. In its per curiam opinion, the Louisiana Supreme Court found that Atkins had fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT