State ex rel. Back v. Starke Circuit Court, 1278S283

Citation390 N.E.2d 643,271 Ind. 82
Decision Date05 June 1979
Docket NumberNo. 1278S283,1278S283
PartiesSTATE ex rel. Marcel BACK and Randy Back, Relators, v. STARKE CIRCUIT COURT, Honorable David P. Matsey, Special Judge, Respondent.
CourtSupreme Court of Indiana

Page 643

390 N.E.2d 643
271 Ind. 82
STATE ex rel. Marcel BACK and Randy Back, Relators,
v.
STARKE CIRCUIT COURT, Honorable David P. Matsey, Special
Judge, Respondent.
No. 1278S283.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
June 5, 1979.

Stephen A. Kray, LaPorte, for relators.

Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Terry G. Duga, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for respondent.

PRENTICE, Justice.

This cause is before us upon the response of the Respondent to our Writ of Mandamus hereinbefore issued, commanding the release of the Relators, under Indiana Criminal Rule P. 4(C). Said response and supporting memoranda pray that said writ not be made permanent and that it be dissolved.

On September 21, 1976, Relators were charged by affidavit and information filed in Starke Circuit Court, Cause No. 6124, with unlawful possession and delivery of marijuana. They were arrested and posted bond, Randy on September 23, 1976, and Marcel on September 25, 1976. On October 28, 1977, the charges were dismissed, on motion of Relators. Meanwhile, a change of judge had been perfected, which occasioned a delay of 66 days, chargeable to Relators.

On November 28, 1977, the State refiled the identical criminal charges against the

Page 644

Relators in Starke Circuit Court, Cause No. 6228. Relators again posted bond and again filed a motion for a change of judge on February 24, 1978; and on March 7, 1978, Special Judge David Matsey [271 Ind. 83] (Respondent) assumed jurisdiction. On April 7, 1978, the cause was scheduled for arraignment, and on April 28, 1978, Relators filed consolidated motions to dismiss and quash arrest warrants and to dismiss and discharge, which motions were set for hearing on May 5, 1978. At the hearing, Judge Matsey took judicial notice of the charges in Cause No. 6124 being identical to the charges filed in Cause No. 6228. Both motions were taken under advisement and subsequently denied on May 18, 1978. In August, a trial date was set for November 2, 1978. On October 5, 1978, Relators filed a motion for continuance and the trial date was reset for December 18, 1978. On November 8, 1978, Relators filed a motion for discharge for delay pursuant to Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C), which motion was denied.

Ind.R.Crim.P. 4(C) provides in part that "(n)o person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later; except where a continuance was had on his motion, or the delay was caused by his act, * * *." Subdivision (F) further provides that "(w)hen a continuance is had on motion of the defendant, or delay in trial is caused by his act, any time limitation contained in this rule shall be extended by the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Curley v. State, 35
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Maryland
    • May 3, 1984
    ...1060, 1062 (Fla.App.1980); 10 Hurt v. State, 62 Ga.App. 878, 10 S.E.2d 136, 137 (1940); 11 State ex rel. Back v. Starke Circuit Court, 271 Ind. 82, 390 N.E.2d 643, 644 (1979). 12 The holding of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in State v. Glenn, 53 Md.App. 717, 456 A.2d 1300 (1983) (in......
  • Hornaday v. State, 49A02-9301-PC-2
    • United States
    • Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana
    • August 22, 1994
    ...chargeable to a defendant "act only to extend the time limitation by the amount of the delays...." Back v. Starke Circuit Court (1979) 271 Ind. 82, 390 N.E.2d 643, 644. Accordingly, the 70-day period began to run with Hornaday's original motion, was extended 26 days due to his delay, and wa......
  • Huffman v. State, 1284S478
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • January 21, 1987
    ...affirmative action to obtain a trial date within the one-year period set by the rule. State ex rel Back v. Starke Circuit Court (1979), 271 Ind. 82, 390 N.E.2d 643, 645; State ex rel Wickliffe v. Marion Criminal Court (1975), 263 Ind. 219, 328 N.E.2d 420. But he does have a duty to alert th......
  • State v. Tomes, 4-683A204
    • United States
    • Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana
    • July 26, 1984
    ...a defendant may not be required to take affirmative action to bring himself to trial, State ex rel. Back v. Starke Circuit Court, (1979) 271 Ind. 82, 390 N.E.2d 643; State ex rel. Wickliffe v. Judge of Criminal Court of Marion County, (1975) 263 Ind. 219, 328 N.E.2d 420, and that we must de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT