State ex rel. Bodine v. Elkhart County Election Bd.
Decision Date | 09 August 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 3-184A7,3-184A7 |
Citation | 466 N.E.2d 773 |
Parties | STATE ex rel., Richard Clay BODINE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ELKHART COUNTY ELECTION BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
David T. Stutsman, Stutsman & Stevens, Elkhart, for plaintiffs-appellants.
John D. Ulmer, R. Gordon Lord, Yoder, Ainlay, Ulmer & Buckingham, Goshen, Charles C. Wicks, Elkhart, Daniel A. Manion, Doran, Manion, Boynton, Kamm & Esmont, South Bend, for defendants-appellees.
On November 29, 1982, appellants filed an action for mandamus in the Elkhart Superior Court, challenging the certification of certain vote totals tallied during the November 2, 1982 general election. The trial court found the suit to be untimely filed, and granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. This appeal follows.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing this cause as untimely filed.
Actions in mandamus to correct the certification of votes in any given election are governed by IND.CODE Sec. 3-1-26-7. This statute provides as follows:
Under the Indiana Election Code, votes are first tallied by precinct officials and delivered to the county board of canvassers. See, IND.CODE Secs. 3-1-25-2, 3-1-25-6, 3-1-25-7, and 3-1-25-8. In order to certify the vote:
See also, IND.CODE Sec. 3-1-25-12.
After the vote is certified, the clerk of the circuit court or the secretary of state is given ten days to make corrections as provided by IND.CODE Sec. 3-1-26-7. Corrections, if any, may be made upon the motion of any duly qualified voter or upon the clerk's or secretary of state's own motion. After this ten-day period has lapsed, voters shall have five days in which to bring an action in mandamus to correct any errors which remain outstanding. Under no circumstances are voters permitted to sue for mandamus after fifteen days from the date on which the vote was certified.
Appellants' action in mandamus was filed 27 days after the vote was certified. They now contend that IND.CODE Sec. 3-1-26-1 extends the time in which to certify the vote by ten days, permitting actions in mandamus to be filed within 25 days of an election.
This interpretation of IND.CODE Sec. 3-1-26-1 misconstrues the plain language employed by the Indiana Legislature. This statute provides in relevant part that:
"Where any person is elected to an office by the voters of a county not to be commissioned by the governor, the clerk of the circuit court shall, after ten (10) days from the time the votes cast at any election have been counted and tabulated, make out and deliver, on demand, to such person, a certificate of his election; and where any officer is to be commissioned by the governor, the clerk of the circuit court shall make out a statement under his hand and the seal of the circuit court specifying the number of votes given to each person for each office, and who has been declared elected, and shall transmit the same, by mail, to the secretary of state, within the time aforesaid."
Appellants have confused the provisions of this statute governing certificates of election with election code provisions regarding certification of the vote. The vote is certified by the board of canvassers and entered by the clerk of the circuit court. This act begins the ten-day period for discovery and correction of errors referred to at IND.CODE Sec. 3-1-26-7. After ten days have passed, the clerk or the secretary of state 1 may issue a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Evansville v. Moore
...misconduct of the parties. South Bend Clinic v. Estate of Ruffing (1986), Ind.App., 501 N.E.2d 1114; State ex rel. Bodine v. Elkhart County Election Board (1984), Ind.App., 466 N.E.2d 773; Donnella v. Crady (1962), 135 Ind.App. 60, 185 N.E.2d 623. Plaintiff-appellee Moore responds with two ......
-
Estate of Decker v. Farm Credit Services of Mid America, ACA
...for the enforcement of a right of action, precluding recovery if the condition is not met. State ex rel. Bodine v. Elkhart County Election Board (1984), Ind.App., 466 N.E.2d 773, 776, reh. denied, trans. denied. Unless a claim is filed within the time allowed by the statute, it is forever b......
-
EVANSVILLE BRANCH NAACP v. Simcox
...However, the statutory provision allowing a mandamus action to be brought is a "nonclaim statute". State Ex Rel. Bodine v. County Election Board, 466 N.E.2d 773 (Ind.App. 1984). Failure to comply with the time limitations imposed, forever bars the action. Bodine, supra. In the present case,......