State ex rel. Chase v. City of Cleveland, No. 25897.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
PartiesSTATE ex rel. CHASE v. CITY OF CLEVELAND et al.
Decision Date25 March 1936
Docket NumberNo. 25897.

130 Ohio St. 587
200 N.E. 840

STATE ex rel. CHASE
v.
CITY OF CLEVELAND et al.

No. 25897.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

March 25, 1936.


Proceeding for writ of mandamus by the State, on the relation of one Chase, against the City of Cleveland and others.-[Editorial Statement.]

Writ allowed.


[Ohio St. 587]Russell N. Chase, of Cleveland, for relator.

Alfred Clum, Director of Law, Perry A. Frey, and Stephen Gobozy, all of Cleveland, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition for a writ of mandamus and the demurrer thereto, and was argued by counsel.

[Ohio St. 588]In substance relator alleges that he is an attorney at law and a member of the bar of the state of Ohio; that Sherley Hornack, a minor ten years of age, is detained incommunicado in the custody of the Cleveland Police Department under $10,000 bond to secure her appearance as a material witness in a case of felonious assault; that relator has been retained by the minor, through her father as natural guardian and next friend; that relator has made repeated demands upon the police department for an opportunity to interview the daughter, to discuss facts concerning her detention and her legal rights, but that the police department arbitrarily refuses him the fundamental right of a lawyer to interview and counsel his client detained in custody, in violation of the Constitution of Ohio and section 13432-15, General Code.

Relator prays writ of mandamus to compel the department of police to permit relator to see, visit, interview, and counsel the minor child during her detention.

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the demurrer be, and the same hereby is, overruled, and respondent not desiring to plead further, a writ of mandamus is allowed on authority of Thomas v. Mills, 117 Ohio St. 114, 157 N.E. 488, 54 A.L.R. 1220.

Writ allowed.

WEYGANDT, C. J., and STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT