State ex rel. City of Elyria v. Trubey
| Decision Date | 31 May 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 3587,3587 |
| Citation | State ex rel. City of Elyria v. Trubey, 484 N.E.2d 169, 20 Ohio App.3d 8 (Ohio App. 1984) |
| Parties | , 20 O.B.R. 8 The STATE, ex rel. CITY OF ELYRIA, Appellee, v. TRUBEY; Lorain County Auditor et al., Appellants. * |
| Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
1.Unless otherwise specified, the rate of post-judgment interest shall be the statutory rate found in R.C. 1343.03.
2.Simple interest is to be used for post-judgment interest unless there is a specific agreement to compound interest or a statutory provision which authorizes otherwise.
George H. Ferguson, City Sol., and Harold A. West, Elyria, for appellee.
Gregory A. White, Pros.Atty., for appellants.
This is the third appeal which has been taken from the complaint in mandamus filed in 1974 by the city of Elyria against D.W. Trubey, the Clerk of Elyria Municipal Court, and the Lorain County Auditor along with its Treasurer.The issues raised on this appeal concern only the payment of interest due on the judgment.The trial court issued the writ directing the Lorain County Auditor and Treasurer to repay the city of Elyria $71,604.24 with six percent interest per annum from the date of each payment.The money was originally overpaid by the city to the county with regard to the operation of the Elyria Municipal Court.
In the order from which this appeal has been taken, the trial court awarded interest at a rate of six percent per annum from 1968 through 1980, eight percent per annum from 1980 through 1982, and at the rate of ten percent per annum after 1982.The auditor and treasurer allege that the rate of interest was fixed at six percent per annum by the terms of the writ and the statutory rates do not apply.This is not so.
The pertinent language of the writ is as follows:
"IT IS ORDERED that DefendantsJulian A. Pijor, Lorain County Auditor, and J. Grant Keys, Lorain County Treasurer, shall issue their warrants and vouchers respectively, repaying the Plaintiff City of Elyria, Ohio, the sum of Seventy-one Thousand Six Hundred Four and 2 4/00 ($71,604.24) Dollars together with Six (6%) Percent interest per annum from the date of each payment thereupon."
The trial court, by its order of September 27, 1983, determined that the interest began to accrue from the date of the first overpayment in 1968.Therefore, under the terms of the writ, the interest was charged at a rate of six percent per annum to commence on the dates of the respective overpayments.The writ, however, contained no specific provision regarding the rate of post-judgment interest.
The auditor and treasurer do not contend that the trial court erred in awarding interest on the judgment, but merely maintain that the incorrect rates were applied.The trial court determined that since no specific rate was identified in the judgment, the statutory rate found in R.C. 1343.03 should apply.Using this standard, the rate would be six percent per annum from 1968 through August 17, 1981.From August 18, 1981 until July 1982, the rate was eight percent per annum.Since July 1982, the statutory rate of interest has been set at a rate of ten percent per annum.
This court finds these applications to be consistent with R.C. 1343.03.Therefore, this court...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Berdyck v. Shinde
...no specific agreement to compound interest or a statutory provision authorizing the compound interest. State ex rel. Elyria v. Trubey (1984), 20 Ohio App.3d 8, 20 OBR 8, 484 N.E.2d 169, Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co. (1989), 59 Ohio App.3d 3, 569 N.E.2d 1070; Leber v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co. (J......
-
Thirty Four Corp. v. Sixty Seven Corp.
...interest is the rule and is to be applied, absent a specific agreement that interest be compounded. State ex rel. Elyria v. Trubey (1984), 20 Ohio App.3d 8, 20 OBR 8, 484 N.E.2d 169. 34 Corp. takes issue with the court's application of this rule by arguing that principles of equity require ......
-
Mayer v. Medancic
...7, 569 N.E.2d 1070; Harrison v. Harrison (Jan. 18, 1989), Montgomery App. No. 11056, 1989 WL 3762, *3; State ex rel. Elyria v. Trubey (1984), 20 Ohio App.3d 8, 9, 20 OBR 8, 484 N.E.2d 169. Indeed, the Tenth District Court of Appeals applied this general rule in the case certified as in conf......
-
Darl E. Reynolds v. Michael S. Morris
... ... from the Ohio State University Airport to CMH dated June 13, ... 1996, in ... interest); State ex rel. Elyria v. Trubey (1984), 20 ... Ohio App.3d 8, 9 ... Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland ... City Council (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 120; Pioche Mines ... ...