State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Kratina
| Decision Date | 25 March 2022 |
| Docket Number | S-21-686. |
| Citation | 311 Neb. 280,971 N.W.2d 333 |
| Parties | STATE of Nebraska EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DISCIPLINE OF the NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT, Relator, v. Mark D. KRATINA, Sr., Respondent. |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
This case is before the court on the voluntary surrender of license and the motion to terminate proceedings filed by the respondent, Mark D. Kratina, Sr., on January 25, 2022. The court accepts the respondent's voluntary surrender of his license and enters a judgment of disbarment. The respondent's motion to terminate proceedings is moot and, accordingly, overruled.
The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Nebraska on July 2, 1976, and at all times relevant to this proceeding, he was engaged in the practice of law in Omaha, Nebraska. On January 25, 2022, the respondent filed a voluntary surrender of his license to practice law. He stated that on August 5, 2021, the chairperson of the Committee on Inquiry of the Second Judicial District filed an application for temporary suspension of the respondent's license, and on September 30, 2021, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law. He has not been reinstated.
The respondent states that for purposes of this voluntary surrender, he knowingly does not challenge or contest the truth of allegations and waives all proceedings against him. He thus acknowledges that without the knowledge or consent of his clients, the respondent withdrew his clients’ funds and misappropriated them for his own use. Subsequently, the respondent made false statements to another attorney and to the Counsel for Discipline to the effect that the funds had been maintained in the trust account.
The Counsel for Discipline attempted to audit the respondent's trust accounts, but the respondent failed to produce any of the requested documents. The Counsel for Discipline served a subpoena duces tecum on the respondent's bank to obtain the respondent's trust account bank statements, which revealed that he misappropriated his clients’ funds in June and August 2017.
The Counsel for Discipline has continued to examine the respondent's trust accounts, which has raised further concerns with respect to costs and advanced expenses paid to the respondent from the same clients’ settlements. The respondent states that he has provided to the Counsel for Discipline all reasonably available documentation with regard to the costs and advanced expenses, including written testimony from his office staff showing the records relied on to invoice for costs and expenses. He has provided the Counsel for Discipline with settlement sheets for all of his personal injury clients from June 2017 to June 2021 whose settlements would have been run through his trust account. He states that no client has failed to receive funds that he or she was due.
The respondent has been previously disciplined by this court. On January 5, 2001, the respondent was publicly reprimanded when his negligence led to a discrepancy in his trust account. And on April 4, 2008, the respondent was suspended for 60 days after advancing sums to a client for transportation and rent.
The respondent stated that he voluntarily surrenders his privilege to practice law in the State of Nebraska; waives his right to notice, appearance, or hearing prior to the entry of an order of disbarment; and consents to the entry of an immediate order of disbarment, with special conditions.
Neb. Ct. R. § 3-315 of the disciplinary rules provides in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial