State Ex Rel. County Court Of Tyler County v. Shipman, No. 7369.
| Court | Supreme Court of West Virginia |
| Writing for the Court | LITZ, J |
| Citation | 165 S.E. 801 |
| Parties | STATE ex rel. COUNTY COURT OF TYLER COUNTY. v. SHIPMAN, Judge, et al. |
| Decision Date | 20 September 1932 |
| Docket Number | No. 7369. |
165 S.E. 801
STATE ex rel. COUNTY COURT OF TYLER COUNTY.
v.
SHIPMAN, Judge, et al.
No. 7369.
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
Sept. 20, 1932.
1. Prohibition lies to restrain the prosecution of an action against a county court upon an illegal and unauthorized claim.
2. It is unlawful for county court to expend money or incur indebtedness not expressly authorized by law; and the authority to do so cannot be inferred by statutory construction.
Original proceeding in the Supreme Court of Appeals for writ of prohibition by the State, on the relation of the County Court of Tyler County, against Honorable James P. Shipman, Judge of the Circuit Court of Marshall County, and others.
Peremptory writ awarded.
O. J. Hill and I. M. Underwood, both of Middlebourne, and Chas. N. Kimball and Wm. J. Brennan, both of Sistersville, for petitioner.
Willis & Ball, of New Martinsville, for respondents.
LITZ, J.
This is an application for a peremptory writ of prohibition by the county court of Tyler county against the Honorable James F. Ship-man, judge of the circuit court of Marshall county, H. E. Humes, clerk of said court, and Sam Hissam, to restrain respondents in the further prosecution of an action instituted by Hissam against relator before a justice of Tyler county for the recovery of $16.75, expenses incurred by him as probation officer of Tyler county.
From a judgment rendered by the justice against him, Hissam appealed to the circuit court of Tyler county. Upon motion of the county court the case was removed from the circuit court of Tyler to the circuit court of Marshall county. Relator now petitions this court for a peremptory writ of prohibition restraining the further prosecution of the action on the ground that the claim asserted against it, based on chapter 49, article 2, section 5 of the Code, is without any legal basis. The statute authorizes: (1) The appointment of "one or two" probation officers in counties having a population of 48, 000 or over, who shall receive salary and expenses not in excess of $100 each, annually; (2) the appointment of one probation officer in counties of a population of 18, 000 or over (and less than 48, 000), who shall receive a salary and expenses not in excess of $100 annually; and (3) the appointment of one probation officer for counties with a population of less than 18, 000 who shall receive a salary not in excess of $100 per year. Without providing for expenses for probation officers in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mohr v. County Court of Cabell County, No. 11094
...to do so could not be implied, citing as authority for that proposition the following cases: State, etc. v. Shipman, 112 W.Va. 529, 165 S.E. 801; Woodyard Publications, Inc. et al. v. Lambert, 112 W.Va. 22, 163 S.E. 858; Norris v. County Court of Cabell County, 111 W.Va. 692, 163 S.E. 418; ......
-
Edwards v. Hylbert, No. 12066
...Publications, Inc. v. Lambert et al., 112 W.Va. 22, 163 S.E. 858; State ex rel. County Court of Tyler County v. Shipman, 112 W.Va. 529, 165 S.E. 801; Ireland v. Board, 115 W.Va. 614, 177 S.E. 452; Humphries v. Black Betsy Consolidated Coal Co., 115 W.Va. 768, 178 S.E. 273. After the 1933 am......
-
First Nat. Bank Of South Charleston v. Mccloud, No. 7117.
...an agreement between said bank, said McCloud, and Samuel Logan" not to pay money out except on the O. K. of Logan. In view of the record, [165 S.E. 801]we would not be warranted in disturbing that finding. Linger v. Watson, 108 W. Va. 180, 150 S. E. 525; Davis v. Davis Trust Co., 107 W. Va.......
-
Mohr v. County Court of Cabell County, No. 11094
...to do so could not be implied, citing as authority for that proposition the following cases: State, etc. v. Shipman, 112 W.Va. 529, 165 S.E. 801; Woodyard Publications, Inc. et al. v. Lambert, 112 W.Va. 22, 163 S.E. 858; Norris v. County Court of Cabell County, 111 W.Va. 692, 163 S.E. 418; ......
-
Edwards v. Hylbert, No. 12066
...Publications, Inc. v. Lambert et al., 112 W.Va. 22, 163 S.E. 858; State ex rel. County Court of Tyler County v. Shipman, 112 W.Va. 529, 165 S.E. 801; Ireland v. Board, 115 W.Va. 614, 177 S.E. 452; Humphries v. Black Betsy Consolidated Coal Co., 115 W.Va. 768, 178 S.E. 273. After the 1933 am......
-
First Nat. Bank Of South Charleston v. Mccloud, No. 7117.
...an agreement between said bank, said McCloud, and Samuel Logan" not to pay money out except on the O. K. of Logan. In view of the record, [165 S.E. 801]we would not be warranted in disturbing that finding. Linger v. Watson, 108 W. Va. 180, 150 S. E. 525; Davis v. Davis Trust Co., 107 W. Va.......