State ex rel. Cunningham v. Wilson
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | HOUGH |
| Citation | State ex rel. Cunningham v. Wilson, 77 Mo. 633 (Mo. 1883) |
| Decision Date | 30 April 1883 |
| Parties | THE STATE ex rel. CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. WILSON. |
Appeal from Macon Circuit Court.--HON. ANDREW ELLISON, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Ben. Eli Guthrie and A. L. Gilstrap for appellant.
Dysart & Mitchell with Chas. P. Hess for respondent.
The relator, as collector of the county of Macon, deposited with the Farmers and Traders' Bank in Macon City, to his credit, as collector, certain revenues collected by him, and on the 15th day of February, 1882, said bank failed and made an assignment to the defendant Wilson. This proceeding was instituted for the purpose of obtaining an allowance of the amount due said collector as a preferred claim under the act of February 11th, 1881. Cunningham, the relator, testified as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
In re Holland Banking Co.
...7212 are: Greeley v. Bank, 98 Mo. 458, tax question; Use v. Rouse, 49 Mo. 586, tax question; State v. Rubey, 77 Mo. 610, and State ex rel. v. Wilson, 77 Mo. 633, county money; State ex rel. v. Trust Co., 209 Mo. 472, giving origin. (2) Cases denying priority, where general insolvency law an......
-
State v. City of Stafford
...161 P. 657 99 Kan. 265 STATE EX REL. BEALS, CO. ATTY., v. CITY OF STAFFORD ET AL. No. 20416[1] Supreme Court of KansasDecember 9, ... 92, 64 N.W ... 1057; State v. Rubey, 77 Mo. 610; State ex rel ... Cunningham v. Wilson, 77 Mo. 633; Cole County v ... Dallmeyer, 101 Mo. 57, 65, 13 S.W. 687; State ex ... ...
-
Rubey v. Watson
...in the bond was simply a creditor of the bank, with respect to the public moneys deposited, as any other depositor. State ex rel. Cunningham v. Wilson, 77 Mo. 633; State v. Rubey, 77 Mo. 610. The claim of the state to the contrary was denied by the supreme court in the above cited cases. II......
-
Rubey v. Watson
... ... H. Cunningham was duly elected collector of the revenue ... within and for the county f Macon, and state aforesaid, and ... duly qualified as such, and gave bond in a large sum ... deposited, as any other depositor. State ex rel ... Cunningham v. Wilson, 77 Mo. 633; State v ... Rubey, 77 Mo. 610 ... ...