State ex rel. Cyr v. Long

Citation140 So. 13,174 La. 169
Decision Date22 January 1932
Docket Number31587
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
PartiesSTATE ex rel. CYR et al. v. LONG

Rehearing Denied February 12, 1932

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F Bell, Judge.

Suit by the State, on the relation of Paul N. Cyr, against Huey P Long. From a judgment overruling defendant's exceptions to the jurisdiction of the court, of no right of action, of the unconstitutionality of Act No. 102 of 1928 and his plea of estoppel, but maintaining his exception of no cause of action and dismissing the suit, relator appeals, and respondent answers the appeal.

Judgment reversed, defendant's exception to the jurisdiction of the courts ratione materiae maintained, and suit dismissed.

Frank J. Looney and E. Wayles Browne, both of Shreveport, and Charles T. Wortham, of Donaldsonville, for appellant.

Huey P. Long, of Baton Rouge, J. G. Palmer, of Shreveport, Leander H. Perez, A. D. Danziger, and Harold A. Moise, all of New Orleans, and Robert J. O'Neal, of Shreveport, for appellee.

BRUNOT, J. O'NIELL, C. J., and ROGERS and ODOM, JJ. OVERTON, LAND, and ST. PAUL, JJ., concur.

OPINION

BRUNOT, J.

This is an intrusion into office suit. It is brought under the provisions of sections 2593, 2594 and 2597 of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana, as amended by Act No. 102 of 1928. The pleadings consist of relator's original and supplemental petitions, to which respondent filed three exceptions and a plea of estoppel. He thereafter pleaded the unconstitutionality of Act No. 102 of 1928.

The issues presented can be briefly stated, but, in this case, we think the pleadings should be quoted in full. The relator's original and supplemental petitions and respondent's exceptions and pleas follow in the order of their filing, viz.:

Petition.

"To the Honorable, the First Judicial District Court of the State of Louisiana, in and for the Parish of Caddo:

"The State of Louisiana on the relation of Paul N. Cyr, a resident of the Parish of Iberia, and said Paul N. Cyr, who joins the State as Plaintiff herein, present this, their petition, as plaintiffs herein, and for cause of action, against Huey P Long, a resident of the Parish of Caddo, now made defendant herein, alleges and avers:

"1. That said Paul N. Cyr, was duly elected Lieutenant, Governor of the State of Louisiana at the election held on the Tuesday next following the third Monday in April, in the year 1928, for the ensuing term of four years, beginning according to law.

"2. That on the 21st day of May, 1928, said Paul N. Cyr, took the oath of office as Lieutenant-Governor and entered upon the duties thereof.

"3. That the said Huey P. Long, Defendant herein, was duly elected Governor of the State of Louisiana, at the election held on the Tuesday next following the third Monday in April, in the year 1928, for the ensuing term of four years beginning according to law.

" 4. That on the 21st day of May, 1928, said Huey P. Long, took the oath of office as Governor, entered upon the discharge of the functions of Governor, and has been claiming and occupying the said office up to the present day; that the said oath contains the language required to be taken by members of the United States Senate, under the Constitution of the United States, Article VI, Clause III.

"5. That at an election held in the State of Louisiana, on the 4th day of November, 1930, according to law, the said Huey P. Long was elected United States Senator from the State of Louisiana for the term beginning March 4th, 1931, and ending March 3rd, 1937.

"6. That the said Huey P. Long submitted his credentials in regular form as United States Senator from Louisiana for the term of six years, beginning March 4th, 1931, to the United States Senate at the National Capitol at Washington, D.C., and they were received and accepted by the said United States Senate, sitting in regular session, and have ever since remained in the records of the United States Senate.

"7. That by thus actively and voluntarily presenting his credentials to the Senate, the said Huey P. Long, irrevocably accepted the Senatorship of the United States from the State of Louisiana, for the term beginning March 4, 1931, in pursuance of his election as such; and he caused himself to be duly enrolled as Senator from the State of Louisiana for said term.

"8. And in consequence of the foregoing the said Huey P. Long, procured for himself all the prerogatives, privileges and immunities possessed by any and all other Senators of the United States.

"9. That the said Huey P. Long, has received official recognition as Senator from the State of Louisiana for the term beginning March 4th, 1931, and is now recognized as such Senator by the Government of the United States.

"10. That there is now no vacancy in the office of Senator from Louisiana.

"11. That the said Huey P. Long, is entitled to receive his salary monthly from and after March 4th, 1931.

"12. That the said Huey P. Long, has had assigned to him as his office as United States Senator from Louisiana, Room No. 141 in the Senate Office Building at the Capitol at Washington, D.C.

"13. That the said Huey P. Long, has had assigned to him, as Senator of Louisiana, telephone No. 888 on the United States Capital Exchange.

"14. That the said Huey P. Long has done divers other acts which can only be performed by the United States Senator.

"15. That subsequent to the 15th day of October, 1931, and after the said Paul N. Cyr had been inducted into the office of Governor, the said Huey P. Long had procured Alvin O. King, President pro tempore of the Senate of the State of Louisiana, to act under the Constitution of Louisiana, and to assume the functions of Lieutenant-Governor and has publicly acknowledged said King as the person who should act as Lieutenant-Governor upon the accession of the elected Lieutenant-Governor, Paul N. Cyr, to the Governorship of Louisiana, which has been vacated by the election, together with the other acts thereafter of the said Huey P. Long.

"16. That, therefore, the said Huey P. Long, Defendant, is today, and has ever since March 4th, 1931, been a member of the United States Congress.

"17. That the Fourth Section of article 19 of the Constitution of the State of Louisiana forbids any Member of Congress to hold or exercise any office of trust or profit under the State of Louisiana.

"18. That by accepting the office of United States Senator, said Huey P. Long, by that act, forfeited and lost all right to hold the office of Governor of Louisiana.

"19. That although the said Huey P. Long, has been duly elected and has voluntarily accepted the office of United States Senator and gone into possession of same, and by that act forfeited and vacated the office of Governor of Louisiana, said Huey P. Long, continues to unlawfully hold and exercise, and to remain in possession of the office of Governor of the State of Louisiana.

"20. That on the 13th day of October, 1931, said Paul N. Cyr, on being advised that he was of right Governor of Louisiana, took the oath of office as such before the Deputy Clerk of the First Judicial District Court, in and for the Parish of Caddo; and in due course deposited the said oath for filing in the office of the Secretary of State of Louisiana.

"21. That on the 13th day of October, 1931, the said Paul N. Cyr advised the said Huey P. Long in writing that he had taken the oath of office as Governor of Louisiana, and had been inducted into said office; and made demand upon the said Huey P. Long that the said Huey P. Long immediately surrendered the office of Governor, together with its archives and all that pertain to such office, and divest himself of the appearance of Governor of Louisiana.

"22. That on Wednesday, October 14th, 1931, the said Huey P. Long, in a written reply to said Paul N. Cyr, declined in toto to accede to the demands of the said Paul N. Cyr.

"23. Plaintiffs further aver that from the date the said Huey P. Long was informed, as aforesaid, that Plaintiff, Paul N. Cyr, had qualified as Governor of Louisiana, and received the demand of said Paul N. Cyr, for the said office of Governor, the said Huey P. Long has held the said office of Governor in bad faith.

"24. That the salary, fees and emoluments appertaining to the office of Governor from the 13th day of October, 1931, until he shall vacate the office of Governor of Louisiana, are justly and truly the property of Plaintiff, Paul N. Cyr, and said Huey P. Long should be condemned to pay over to said Paul N. Cyr, such fees and emoluments as he has drawn appertaining to the period beginning October 13th, 1931, to the time of his vacating the said office.

"Wherefore, Plaintiffs pray that the said Defendant, Huey P. Long, be duly cited to appear and answer this petition, and after legal delays and due proceedings had, judgment be rendered in favor of Plaintiffs, and against the said Huey P. Long, ordering the said Huey P. Long to immediately vacate the said office of Governor of Louisiana, and to deliver the same to the said Paul N. Cyr; and that he be further condemned to deliver to said Paul N. Cyr, all property of the State of Louisiana, and all books and papers in his possession appertaining to the office of Governor of Louisiana.

"And plaintiffs further pray that if the said Huey P. Long should refuse to comply with the judgment of this Court, that he be ejected from the said office in the manner provided by law.

"Plaintiffs further pray that the said Huey P Long, be ordered to pay over to the said Paul N. Cyr, all salary which he shall have drawn as Governor of the State of Louisiana, pertaining to the period which shall have elapsed from the 13th day of October, 1931, up to the time he vacates and delivers...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State ex rel. Olson v. Langer, 6288.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 28, 1934
    ...of the office’ upon the Lieutenant Governor pending the trial of the charges. * * *” We have not overlooked the case of State ex rel. Cyr v. Long, 174 La. 169, 140 So. 13. We have considered it, and its reasoning as applied to the facts in this case does not appeal to us. The respondent's c......
  • State, Relation of Olson v. Langer
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1934
    ... ... [256 N.W. 382] ...           The ... question of jurisdiction was raised in the late Alabama case ... of State ex rel. Moore v. Blake, 225 Ala. 124, 142 ... So. 418 and the court said: "Appellant insists that a ... sheriff can now be removed from office only by ... trial of the charges ... " ...          We have ... not overlooked the case of State ex rel. Cyr v ... Long, 174 La. 169, 140 So. 13. We have considered it, ... and its reasoning as applied to the facts in this case, does ... not appeal to us ... ...
  • First Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Bell
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1932
    ...the court either to remand the case then pending on appeal, for the introduction of evidence of the alleged fraud and false swearing with [140 So. 13] regard to the extent of Mrs. Bell's injuries, or to postpone a hearing of the case until the suit to annul the judgment appealed from could ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT