State, ex rel. Davis v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Morrill

CourtNebraska Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtDAY, J.
CitationState, ex rel. Davis v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Morrill, 206 N.W. 759, 114 Neb. 217 (Neb. 1925)
Decision Date31 December 1925
Docket Number24429
PartiesSTATE, EX REL. CLARENCE A. DAVIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK OF MORRILL. NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, v. FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK OF MORRILL ET AL., APPELLEES

APPEAL from the district court for Scotts Bluff county: P. J BARRON, JUDGE. Reversed, with directions.

REVERSED.

Honnold & Clark and J. M. Fitzgerald, for appellant.

C. M Skiles and Mothersead & York, contra.

Heard before MORRISSEY, C. J., DAY, GOOD, THOMPSON and EBERLY, JJ.

OPINION

DAY, J.

In the receivership of the Farmers & Merchants Bank of Morrill, Nebraska, the National Surety Company of New York filed its claim and asked that it be allowed as a preferred claim and paid out of the depositors' guaranty fund. The trial court refused to allow the claim as one payable out of the guaranty fund, but allowed it with some deduction as a general claim against the bank. From this judgment the claimant appeals.

The facts are not in dispute. The record shows that on June 15, 1921, the Farmers & Merchants Bank of Morrill, as principal, and the National Surety Company of New York, as surety, executed and delivered to the county of Scotts Bluff a bond in the sum of $ 10,000. Generally speaking, the provisions of the bond were to indemnify the county against the loss of money deposited in the bank by the county treasurer in excess of 50 per cent. of the paid-up capital of the bank; that the bank would pay interest at 2 per cent. on the amount of the deposits, based on the average daily deposits, and would repay the entire sum deposited upon written demand of the county treasurer.

During the term of the bond, and on August 16, 1922, the bank failed and a receiver was duly appointed to wind up its affairs. At the time of the failure of the bank, the treasurer of Scotts Bluff county had on deposit in the bank $ 14,722.26 belonging to the county, of which some $ 1,097.26 was in excess of 50 per cent. of the capital of the bank and was money protected by the bond. The county treasurer filed a claim with the receiver for the entire amount on deposit and asked that the claim be allowed as a preferred claim and paid out of the guaranty fund. On March 19, 1923, the court allowed the claim to the extent of $ 13,625 as a preferred claim and ordered it paid out of the guaranty fund. As to the balance, $ 1,097.26 the court deferred...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex