State ex rel. Everett v. Bourne
Decision Date | 02 November 1891 |
Citation | 21 Or. 218,27 P. 1048 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. EVERETT v. BOURNE. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Multnomah county; ERASMUS D. SHATTUCK Judge.
Letters rogatory were issued by the superior court of Suffolk county Mass., to the circuit court of Multnomah county, Or requesting that the latter require Jonathan Bourne, Jr., to appear before a commissioner appointed by the former, and answer interrogatories. From an order committing said Bourne for contempt in disobeying a writ issued in pursuance of the letters rogatory, he appeals. Affirmed.
STATEMENT BY THE COURT. The following is a copy of the dedimus potestatem issued out of the superior court of Suffolk Mass., authorizing the taking of the depositions of Jonathan Bourne, Jr.:
On the 27th day of June, 1891, a paper was served on the appellant of which the following is a copy:
Thereafter, on the 5th day of August, 1891, the superior court of Suffolk, Mass., issued the following letters rogatory:
On the 17th day of September, 1891, the circuit court of Multnomah county, Or., entered upon its journal the following order "And now, at this day, upon presentation to this court of letters rogatory from the superior court of Suffolk county, Massachusetts, setting forth, among other things, the issuance out of said court of a commission in a cause therein pending between Annie B. Everett, as plaintiff, and John Stetson, as defendant, directed to A.C. Emmons, Esq., of Portland, notary public, as commissioner to take the deposition of Jonathan Bourne, Jr., of Portland, in answer to interrogatories and cross-interrogatories attached to said commission, and setting forth that said Bourne refused to appear before said commissioner, but made default, and representing that without the testimony of said Bourne justice cannot be completely done between said parties, and requesting us that in furtherance of justice we afford our aid in the examination of said witness by said commissioner, upon said commission, under said interrogatories, and that by the usual proper process of our court we cause said Bourne to appear before said commissioner at a time and place by us to be fixed, and him examine on oath or affirmation to the several interrogatories to said commission annexed, and that we cause his deposition to be committed to writing, and returned, and duly closed and sealed up, and returned with said letters, and offering to do the same favor for us in a similar case when required, it is therefore ordered that in accordance with said request, a writ in due form issue, out of this court, directed to the sheriff of this county, and reciting the above facts, and directing said sheriff to summon said Jonathan Bourne, Jr., to appear before said A.C. Emmons, Esq., notary public, commissioner, at his office in the city of Portland, First National Bank building, corner First and Washington streets, upon Monday, September 21, A.D. 1891, at 10 o'clock A.M., and upon such further time or times to which the taking of said deposition may be adjourned by said commissioner, then and there to testify before...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Electric Reduction Co. of Canada, Limited v. Crane
...however, to be exercised arbitrarily, and not bound under all circumstances to honor the request. Ex parte Taylor, supra; State v. Bourne, 1891, 21 Or. 218, 27 P. 1048; McKenzie's Case, 1843, 2 Pars.Sel.Eq.Cas., Pa., 227, 1 Clark 356; Robb's Petition, 1892, 11 Pa.Co.Ct.R. 298; Doubt v. Pitt......
-
Magdanz v. District Court in and for Woodbury County
... ... issued out of a court of a foreign state ... Writ ... sustained ... ... 331, 220 S.W. 74, ... 9 A.L.R. 963, and in State v. Bourne, 21 Or. 218, 27 ... P. 1048, proceedings had been initiated in one state ... ...
-
Cribben v. Deal
... ... on the next day was recorded. Upon this state of facts the ... contention is that such deed is void because the ... ...
-
Ex Parte Taylor
...the ruling here made: Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 320; 4 Jones on Evidence, sec. 400; Weeks on Depositions, sec. 128; State v. Bourne, 21 Or. 218, 27 Pac. 1048; Keller v. Goodrich Co., 117 Ind. 556, 19 N. E. 196, 10 Am. St. Rep. 88; In re Whitlock, 51 Hun, 351, 3 N. Y. Supp. 855; Anonymous,......