State ex rel. Fry v. Fry, (1977)
| Jurisdiction | Oregon |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon ex rel. Alberta Ann FRY, Respondent, v. Robert Frederick FRY, Appellant. |
| Citation | 559 P.2d 1293,28 Or.App. 403 |
| Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
| Decision Date | 08 February 1977 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
State v. Zamora-Skaar
...comply partially with the decree, the law requires that he comply to the extent of his ability.’ " (Quoting State ex rel. Fry v. Fry , 28 Or. App. 403, 406, 559 P.2d 1293 (1977).)In this case, OSH argued, it was unable to comply with defendant's .370 order even though the hospital was opera......
-
Marriage of Quenzer, Matter of
...between husband's place of residence and the various places wife has been since the time of the divorce. See State ex rel. Fry v. Fry, 28 Or.App. 403, 559 P.2d 1293 (1977). However, there was ample evidence that wife deliberately secreted herself and the child, that she changed locations, a......
-
State v. Vanden-Busch (In re Altenhofen)
...is able to comply partially with the decree, the law requires that he comply to the extent of his ability.” State ex rel. Fry v. Fry, 28 Or.App. 403, 406, 559 P.2d 1293 (1977) ; see also State ex rel. Wolf v. Wolf, 11 Or.App. 477, 480, 503 P.2d 1255 (1972) (“The law requires that one comply......
-
State ex rel. Mikkelsen v. Hill
...181 Or. 157, 164, 179 P.2d 278, 1023 (1947), overruled on other grounds State ex rel. Hathaway v. Hart, supra; State ex rel. Fry v. Fry, 28 Or.App. 403, 559 P.2d 1293 (1977). Accordingly, the state contends that, unlike in the California scheme, it is not required to prove defendant's abili......
Request a trial to view additional results