State ex rel. Grievance Committee of Oregon State Bar Ass'n v. Woerndle
Decision Date | 11 December 1923 |
Citation | 109 Or. 461,220 P. 744 |
Parties | STATE EX REL. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF OREGON STATE BAR ASS'N ET AL. v. WOERNDLE. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
In banc. Disbarment proceedings by the State of Oregon, on the relation of the Grievance Committee of the Oregon State Bar Association and the Grievance Committee and Chancellors of the Multnomah Bar Association of the State of Oregon, against Joseph Woerndle. Defendant suspended.
See also, 209 P. 604.
Bradley A. Ewers and Elton Watkins, both of Portland, for plaintiff.
C. T Haas and Joseph Woerndle, both of Portland, for defendant.
This is not a criminal proceeding, having for its object the punishment of Joseph Woerndle. The defendant is charged with offending against the laws of the United States, not of the state of Oregon. This is a special proceeding, summary in character, instituted for the purpose of disbarring the defendant. It is not a case wherein the attorney at law has wronged a trusting client or deceived the court. But the defendant, according to the findings, has violated a law of the United States.
Under the circumstances disclosed by the record, should we revoke Woerndle's license as an attorney at law, a public officer of this state?
In October, 1914, Hans W. Boehn, a reserve officer in the German army, residing in Portland, Or., desired to return to his native land for the purpose of joining the army. Joseph Woerndle, a naturalized citizen of the United States and an inhabitant of Portland, Or., interested himself in Boehn's behalf, and, in accordance with the rules prescribed by the United States government, applied to the Secretary of State of the United States for a passport for himself. On its issuance, he caused it to be sent to the city of New York, where, by agreement, it was received by Boehn and this passport enabled Boehn, under the name of Joseph Woerndle, to pass into the boundaries of the German Empire.
Following the lawful regulations relative to the application for, and issuance of, passports by the federal government, Woerndle filed his application in the form of an affidavit, which contained this material statement:
"I am about to go abroad temporarily; * * * I intend to return to the United States within one year for the purpose of residing and performing the duties of citizenship therein."
It is averred by the prosecution that the excerpt above quoted was willfully false and corrupt and was a violation of section 125 of the federal Penal Code (U. S. Comp. St. § 10295) defining perjury.
This case was before the court on demurrer to the petition for disbarment herein. See State ex rel. Grievance Committee of Oregon State Bar Ass'n et al. v. Woerndle, decided October 10, 1922, reported in 209 P. 604. The court held that the petition stated cause sufficient. Thereafter, upon reference to the judge of the Nineteenth judicial district of the state of Oregon, the testimony was taken, and, among others, the following findings of fact were made:
The court further found:
"That Joseph Woerndle bears a good reputation for honesty, integrity, industry and uprightness, both in and out of his profession, and is a law-abiding citizen, except as in these findings particularly specified."
There are certain writings in the record bearing date prior to the time of the declaration of war by the United States, which show Woerndle's exalted view of the Kaiser. In a letter to his brother, bearing date May 8, 1916, he unrestrainedly glorifies the ruler of the Imperial German Empire:
The record contains letters written by Woerndle prior to the entry of the United States into the World War, wherein he goes to the verge in criticizing the President of the United...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moss v. Woodcock
... ... Oregon for 1923. To make our position absolutely clear ... ...