State ex rel. Harth v. Phipps
Decision Date | 02 June 1931 |
Citation | 299 P. 1009,136 Or. 454 |
Parties | STATE EX REL. v. PHIPPS, COUNTY JUDGE, ET AL. HARTH ET AL. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
In Bank.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Wasco County; Fred W. Wilson, Judge.
Mandamus by the State, on the relation of Charles A. Harth and others against F. L. Phipps, County Judge, and L. B. Kelly and another, County Commissioners of Wasco County. Judgment of dismissal, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
This is a proceeding in mandamus, instituted in the circuit court for Wasco county, Or., on October 6, 1930, by the state of Oregon, on the relation of Charles A. Harth, Walter R Bailey, Ruth C. Gill, and J. W. Logan, against F. L. Phipps county judge, and L. B. Kelly and George Chamberlain, county commissioners, of Wasco county.
Based upon the allegations of the petition, a writ of mandamus was duly issued out of the above-entitled court, and returned on October 6, 1930, requiring the defendants forthwith to levy a tax of from one to ten mills on the dollar on the taxable property situate within the corporate limits of Dalles City Dufur, and Mosier, in accordance with the provisions of section 4600, Or. L., as amended by chapter 356, p. 470, General Laws of Oregon 1927, or to show cause for their failure and refusal so to do.
The defendants answered the writ by alleging the existence of charter provisions whereby the municipalities involved were exempt from the levy of a general road tax by the county court.
On November 22, 1930, the plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, whereby it sought an order requiring the defendants to levy a tax of from one to ten mills on the dollar on all taxable property in Wasco county, Or "including the taxable property within the corporate limits of Dalles City, Dufur and Mosier in said county, for the year 1930 and subsequent years, as required by section 4600, Oregon Laws as amended by the General Laws of Oregon 1927, chapter 356, Session Laws of 1927, page 470, on the ground and for the reason that the charter provisions of said Dalles City, Dufur and Mosier set out in the answer of the defendants herein filed and in the plaintiff's petition herein and in the writ of mandamus issued herein, have been superseded and repealed by said section 4600, Laws of Oregon, as amended."
The defendants moved for a judgment on the pleadings, on the ground that they had no authority to lexy the tax for which the plaintiff had petitioned.
The court denied the plaintiff's motion, and adjudged that the motion of the defendants be sustained and allowed, and dismissed the proceeding. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed to this court.
J. J. Johnson, of Portland (Albert H. Tanner, of Portland, on the brief), for appellants.
Francis V. Galloway, Dist. Atty., John Gavin, and Celia Gavin, all of The Dalles, for respondents.
BROWN, J. (after stating the facts as above).
The provision of the charter of Dalles City approved February 17, 1899 (section 99), section 4, chapter 280, p. 823, Special Laws of Oregon 1905, exempting that municipality from the jurisdiction of the county court of Wasco county, and upon which the defendants rely, reads:
Like provisions exist in the charter of Mosier, incorporated on October 6, 1913, and in the special law incorporating the town of Dufur, enacted in 1905. See Special Laws of Oregon 1905, c. 273, p. 743.
Section 4600, Or. L., as amended by chapter 356, p. 470, General Laws of Oregon 1927, the same being the section relied upon by the plaintiff, reads:
The determination of this cause rests upon the construction of the foregoing section, now codified as Or. Code 1930, § 44-2101, and the application of that section to incorporated cities and towns in this state having charter provisions exempting such municipalities from the payment of a general road tax. At the inception, it will be helpful to notice the history of the several legislative acts involved. Tracing the history of the acts relied upon by Dalles City to exempt it from the provisions of the section quoted above, we note, first, chapter 1, Special Laws of Oregon, 1880, entitled: "An Act To incorporate Dalles City and repeal an act entitled, 'An Act to incorporate Dalles City,' approved October 15, 1862, and also an act entitled, 'An Act to incorporate Dalles City,' approved October 24, 1868, and also an act entitled, 'An Act to amend an act entitled "An Act to incorporate Dalles City," 'approved October 26, 1870." Section 100 of that act excepts the territory within the limits of Dalles City out of the jurisdiction of the county court of Wasco county, for road purposes, and exempts the inhabitants of Dalles City from the payment of road taxes, or the assessment of property within that city for road work. This exemption in the charter of Dalles City has been reenacted, but never repealed.
Section 99 of Dalles City Charter, approved February 17, 1899 (Laws 1899, p. 1033), section 4 of chapter 280, p. 823, Special Laws of Oregon 1905, contains the exemption excepting Dalles City from the jurisdiction of the county court for the purpose of levying a road tax, in substantially the language of the original exemption contained in section 100 of chapter 1 of the act of 1880 just alluded to.
We fully realize that laws exempting property from taxation must be strictly construed. In other words exemptions are not favorites of the law of taxation. However, it is quite apparent that, in the year 1880, the legislative mind resolved--and carried out its purpose--to exempt Dalles City from the provisions of the road law then on the statute books. The provisions of the exemption...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lilly v. Gladden
...harmonized. Ulrich v. Lincoln Realty Co., 1946, 180 Or. 380, 168 P.2d 582, 175 P.2d 149; Webber v. Bailey, supra; State ex rel. Harth v. Phipps, 1931, 136 Or. 454, 299 P. 1009; 1 Sutherland, Statutory Construction (3d ed. 1943) § 2014. The harmony sought for here is not necessarily a perfec......
-
State v. Coats
......413, 13. P.2d 1075; Patton v. Withycombe, 81 Or. 210, 159 P. 78; State ex rel. Harth v. Phipps, 136 Or. 454, 299. P. 1009; State ex rel. Thomas v. Hoss, 143 Or. 41,. ......
-
Comm'r of Taxation v. Bennett (In re Raynolds' Estate)
...Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City and County of San Francisco, 1931, 211 Cal. 387, 295 P. 813;State ex rel. Harth v. Phipps, 1931, 136 Or. 454, 299 P. 1009;Texas Unemployment Compensation Comm. v. Bass, 1941, 137 Tex. 1, 151 S.W.2d 567, 570. Although we recognize that administrative inter......
-
In re Raynolds' Estate
...in those states. Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City and County of San Francisco, 1931, 211 Cal. 387, 295 P. 813; State ex rel. Harth v. Phipps, 1931, 136 Or. 454, 299 P. 1009; Texas Unemployment Compensation Comm. v. Bass, 1941, 137 Tex. 1, 151 S.W.2d 567, 570. Although we recognize that a......