State Ex Rel. Landis v. Harris
Decision Date | 11 June 1934 |
Citation | 120 Fla. 555,163 So. 237 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. LANDIS, Atty. Gen. v. HARRIS et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
On Rehearing Oct. 3, 1935.
En Banc.Original proceeding in quo warranto by the State, on the relation of Cary D. Landis, as Attorney General, against Raymond Harris and another.
Judgment in favor of respondents without prejudice, and the proceeding dismissed.
Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., and Evan Evans and Will O. Murrell, both of Jacksonville, for relator.
Giles J. Patterson, Henry P. Adair, A. W. Cockrell, Jr., Francis P Fleming, Francis M. Holt, Charles Cook Howell, W. D. Jones Jr., and E. J. L'Engle, all of Jacksonville, for respondents.
The Attorney General filed in this court an information in the nature of quo warranto in which it is in substance alleged that respondents.
--'for the space of, to-wit, six months next last past and upwards have used, enjoyed, exercised and performed and still do use enjoy, exercise and perform, without warrant or authority of law, and in violation of the constitution of the said State of Florida, the franchise, functions and powers of Jury Commissioners of Duval County, Florida, * * * as authorized or required by chapter 16058, Laws of 1933.'
Which said law is in violation of stated sections of the Constitution of Florida, viz., sections 16,20, and21 article 3,sections 1and3 of the Declaration of Rights of the Florida Constitution.
'The said Attorney General prays the advice of this Court in the premises and due process of law in this behalf to the said Raymond Harris and John S. Bond, Jr., as alleged Jury Commissioners of Duval County, Florida requiring them to answer the said State by what warrant or authority of law they claim to have and exercise jurisdiction and authority as Jury Commissioners of Duval County, Florida, and that this Honorable Court upon and after a hearing in due course as prescribed by law, shall enter its order ousting the said Respondents, from the said office.'
A writ was issued in due course.Respondents filed a demurrer to the information containing the following:
'1.Chapter 16058, Laws of Florida, approved June 7, 1933, is not obnoxious to the constitutional provisions set forth in said information.
'2.The information in the nature of quo warranto in this cause does not state any matters of fact or reasons in law why the respondents should not continue to use, enjoy, exercise and perform the franchise, cunctions and powers of jury commissioners of Duval County, Florida.
The relator filed a motion for judgment of ouster:
'Comes now the Relator herein and moves the Court to enter a judgment of ouster against the respondents above named, as prayed for in the information filed herein, ousting the Respondents from their pretended office of Jury Commissioners of Duval County, Florida, on the ground that no sufficient response has been made by the respondents to the information herein and the information herein being shown to be well founded, and the facts therein set forth being shown to be true.'
Chapter 16058, Acts 1933, is as follows:
'An Act Providing For and Creating Jury Commissioners in All Counties of the State of Florida Having a Population Exceeding 155,000 by the Last Preceding Federal Census, and Prescribing Their Qualifications, Method of Appointment, Powers, Duties, Functions and Official Terms, and Providing for the Selection, Listing and Procurement of Jurors in Such Counties.
'Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
'Approved June 7, 1933.'
OPINIONQuo warranto proceedings were instituted in this court by the Attorney General to have determined the constitutional validity of chapter 16058, Acts 1933, under which the respondents are performing the function of selecting and certifying names of persons qualified for jury duty, which duty had theretofore been performed by the county commissioners.
It is in substance contended that chapter 16058 is a local and not a general law, and thereby violates the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Waybright v. Duval County
... ... According to the Last Florida State Census, or Any Subsequent ... State or Federal Census'. The words quoted ... character, else the act will be declared a local one ... State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So ... 667; State ex rel. Buford ... court sustained ... In the ... case of State ex rel. Landis v. Wheat, 103 Fla. 1, ... 137 So. 277, 282, the court had before it the ... See State ex ... rel. Landis v. Harris, 120 Fla. 555, 163 So. 237. This ... court considered for the second ... ...
-
Weaver v. Myers
...adopted is illegal." Dep't of Bus. Reg. v. Classic Mile, Inc., 541 So.2d 1155, 1157 (Fla. 1989) (quoting State ex rel. Landis v. Harris, 120 Fla. 555, 163 So. 237, 240 (1934) ).On the other hand, a law is general if "it operates uniformly upon subjects as they may exist in the state, applie......
-
Hysler v. State
... ... Fla. 211] Sam B. Wilson, of Jacksonville, for plaintiff in ... Cary D ... Landis, Atty. Gen., and Tyrus A. Norwood, Asst. Atty. Gen., ... for the State ... OPINION ... An examination shows the brief, inadvertently, failed ... to cite the case of State ex rel. Landis v. Harris, ... 120 Fla. 555, 163 So. 237, 242, where each of the questions ... raised ... ...
-
Fla. Dep't of Health v. Florigrown, LLC
...persons or things when classification is not permissible or the classification adopted is illegal." State ex rel. Landis v. Harris , 120 Fla. 555, 163 So. 237, 240 (1934) (citation omitted). Additionally, in consideration of the constitutional requirement that a special law not be passed wi......