State ex rel. McKeage v. Circuit Court (Cordonnier)
| Docket Number | SC91658 |
| Decision Date | 17 January 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
31 cases
-
St. Louis Cnty. v. River Bend Estates Homeowners' Ass'n
...the logic of the circumstance, is arbitrary and unreasonable, and indicates a lack of careful consideration.” State ex rel. McKeage v. Cordonnier, 357 S.W.3d 597, 599 (Mo. banc 2012) (quoting Green v. Fred Weber, Inc., 254 S.W.3d 874, 880 (Mo. banc 2008)). “If reasonable persons can differ ......
-
Travis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...their contractual rights and duties," and "[a] valid choice of law provision in a contract binds the parties." State ex rel. McKeage v. Cordonnier , 357 S.W.3d 597, 601 (Mo. 2012). However, "where the application of the chosen law would be contrary to Missouri public policy, Missouri courts......
-
BancorpSouth Bank v. Hazelwood Logistics Ctr., LLC
...of the contracts. Under Missouri law, “[a] valid choice of law provision in a contract binds the parties,” State ex rel. McKeage v. Cordonnier, 357 S.W.3d 597, 600 (Mo.2012) (en banc), and the parties here—including MPT, whose contract with HLC was made and performed in Missouri—do not cont......
-
Hootselle v. Mo. Dep't of Corr.
...the logic of the circumstance, is arbitrary and unreasonable, and indicates a lack of careful consideration." State ex rel. McKeage v. Cordonnier , 357 S.W.3d 597, 599 (Mo. banc 2012).DiscussionClass certification is governed by Rule 52.08. In addition to the numerosity, commonality, typica......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
All Aboard? Missouri Statute Risks Failing to Protect Consumers from Hidden Fees and Deceptive Practices of Prominent Companies.
...(87) Id. (88) Id. (quoting Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co., 283 U.S. 353, 356 (1931)); State ex rel. McKeage v. Cordonnier, 357 S.W.3d 597, 600 (Mo. 2012) ("Generally, parties may choose the state whose law will govern the interpretation of their contractual rights and duties. ......