STATE EX REL. MUTIN v. State

CourtLouisiana Supreme Court
CitationSTATE EX REL. MUTIN v. State, 804 So.2d 642 (La. 2001)
Decision Date14 December 2001
Docket NumberNo. 2001-KH-1131.,2001-KH-1131.
PartiesSTATE ex rel. Samuel MUTIN v. STATE of Louisiana.

Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Warren v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana
    • June 29, 2016
    ...44 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/28/01), 784 So.2d 46, 79, writs denied, 01–1533, 01–1534, 01–1543, 01–1544, 01–1629, 01–1853, 01–1931, (La.12/14/01), 804 So.2d 642, 643, 644, cert. denied, Territo v. Adams, 535 U.S. 1107, 122 S.Ct. 2318, 152 L.Ed.2d 1071 (2002).The adequacy of jury instructions must b......
  • Roper v. John Chandler Loupe & the Consoldated Governing Body of Bation Rouge & the Parish of E. Baton Rouge
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana
    • October 28, 2016
    ...Co., 2000-344 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/28/01), 784 So. 2d 46, 76, writs denied, 2001-1533, 2001-1534 (La. 12/14/01), 804 So. 2d 642, 2001-1543, 2001-1544, 2001-1629 (La. 12/14/01), 804 So. 2d 643, 2001-1853, 2001-1931 (La. 12/14/01), 804 So. 2d 644, and cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1107, 122 S.Ct. 2318......
  • National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrington
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana
    • April 17, 2003
    ...5 Cir. 3/28/01), 784 So.2d 46, 69, writs denied, 01-1533, 01-1534, 01-1543, 01-1544, 01-1629, 01-1853, 01-1931, 01-1953 (La.12/14/01), 804 So.2d 642, 643, 644, 645, the court For purposes of [La.Code Civ.P. art. 1764], the number of sides in a lawsuit is determined by the legal posture of t......
  • Dusto v. Rogers Corp.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • October 24, 2023
    ...disease due to dose response relationship as well as individual sensitivity or individual responsiveness to exposure), writ denied, 804 So. 2d 642 (La. 2001), and writ denied, 804 So. 2d 642 (La. 2001), and writ denied, 804 So. 2d 643 (La. 2001), and writ denied, 804 So. 2d 643 (La. 2001), ......
  • Get Started for Free