State ex rel. Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines v. Public Service Com'n
Citation | 110 S.W.2d 364,232 Mo.App. 605 |
Parties | STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. ORSCHELN BROTHERS TRUCK LINES, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT |
Decision Date | 27 November 1937 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Kansas |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Cole County.--Hon. Nike G. Sevier Judge.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Judgment affirmed.
Frank E. Atwood and D. D. McDonald for appellant.
James P. Boyd and Daniel C. Rogers for respondent.
This proceeding was commenced before the Public Service Commission of Missouri against Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., by the filing of the complaint of Anderson Motor Service Company, Inc., and Brashear Truck Company, Inc. The substance of the complaint was that Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., were transporting through freight from Kansas City to St. Louis and from St. Louis to Kansas City over U.S. Highway No. 40 without having obtained authority of the Public Service Commission to do so.
The prayer was that the commission issue an order directing that the said Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., cease and desist from said operations. The answer of the Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., challenged the power of the commission to determine the matters in controversy; alleged that any attempt by the Public Service Commission to exercise jurisdiction in the matter was in contravention of Article 3 of the Constitution of Missouri for the reason that said commission had no authority to exercise judicial power; that said Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., was the holder of a certificate of convenience and necessity No. T-403 which authorized it to perform the services complained of; and that the matters complained of were before the commission in case No. T-2110 and it was therein decided that it had authority to receive and transport property between the cities of St. Louis and Kansas City.
The complaint was heard and sustained by the commission and the said Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines ordered to refrain from transporting through freight between St. Louis and Kansas City directly over highway No. 40, and that it should confine its operations between those two points to the routes otherwise authorized.
In due time and in the proper form the proceeding was lodged in the circuit court of Cole county by the said Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc. Upon the hearing in the circuit court the order of the commission was affirmed and the Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., hereinafter called appellant, appealed.
The evidence on behalf of the complainants was to the effect that each of them held a certificate of convenience and necessity authorizing the transportation of freight by motor from Kansas City to St. Louis and from the latter city to the former over U.S. Highway No. 40.
In making its defense the appellant introduced in evidence various certificates of convenience and necessity authorizing it to operate as a freight-carrying motor carrier.
The first certificate obtained by appellant was T-403. That certificate entitled it to operate as a freight-carrying motor carrier over a regular route described as follows:
Thereafter the present complainants filed with the commission a complaint (case No. T-2110) against the appellant, charging they were authorized motor carriers of property between St. Louis and Kansas City and that the present appellant had not obtained authority to render such service. The complaint was heard and findings of fact made, no part of which is material in the instant proceeding except the following:
The complaint was dismissed by the commission.
In case No. T-2719 the commission ordered that the authority granted to Vernon A. Worts under certificate T-553 be transferred to appellant and merged under certificate T-403. The authority under certificate T-553 was as follows:
In June, 1933, appellant filed application with the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Crown Coach Co. v. Public Service Com'n
... ... State ex rel. Interstate Transit Lines v. Pub. Serv ... Comm., 234 Mo.App. 554, 132 S.W.2d ; State ex ... rel. Potashnick Truck Service v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 129 ... S.W.2d 69. The ... Serv. Comm., 129 S.W.2d 69; State ex rel. Orscheln ... Truck Lines v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 232 Mo.App. 605, 110 ... ...
-
State ex rel. Union Elec. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of State
...ex rel. Mo. Pac. Freight Transp. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 312 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.App.1958); State ex rel. Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 232 Mo.App. 605, 110 S.W.2d 364 (1937)); see also State ex rel. Laclede Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 392 S.W.3d 24, 36 (Mo.App. W.D.2012) ......