State ex rel. Plutshack v. State Dept. of Health and Social Services

Decision Date09 April 1968
Citation157 N.W.2d 567,37 Wis.2d 713
PartiesSTATE ex rel Robert F. PLUTSHACK, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

Robert H. Friebert, State Public Defender, Atty., for petitioner.

Bronson C. La Follette, Atty. Gen., William A. Platz, Thomas A. Lockyear, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

John A. Koshalek, Madison, for Wis. Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.

Dennis J. Purtell, Milwaukee, for Milwaukee Jr. Bar Ass'n, amicus curiae.

Joseph F. Preloznik and Jonathan Jackson, Jr., Madison, for Wis. Judicare, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM(on motion for rehearing).

The statepublic defender has made a motion for rehearing and filed a brief in support of the motion.Briefs amicus curiae were also filed in support of the motion.The motion is denied with this sole comment: The brief of the statepublic defender in support of the motion for rehearing refers to the prior conviction of November 21, 1965, for disorderly conduct and resisting an officer as a municipal ordinance conviction.This is merely an allegation of the statepublic defender and entirely unsupported by the record.The judgment of conviction and sentence, sentencing petitioner under the repeater statute, states the November 21st conviction was 'for drunk and disorderly conduct and resisting an officer,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 10 Mayo 1971
    ...969, 25 L.Ed.2d 129 (1970); State ex rel. Plutshack v. State Department of Health & Social Serv., 37 Wis.2d 713, 155 N.W.2d 549, 555, 157 N.W.2d 567 (1968); cf. City of Toledo v. Frazier, 10 Ohio App.2d 51, 226 N.E.2d 777, 781--783 (1967); Hortencio v. Fillis, 25 Utah 2d 73, 475 P.2d 1011, ......
  • State ex rel. Johnson v. Cady
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 2 Abril 1971
    ...fair administration of justice.' (State ex rel. Plutshack v. Dept. of Health and Social Services (1968), 37 Wis.2d 713, 155 N.W.2d 549, 157 N.W.2d 567.) While there applying a federal statute requiring an appearance before the court in federal code probation revocations, the reference in Es......
  • State v. Groppi
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 4 Febrero 1969
    ...an ideal result.' State ex rel. Plutshack v. State Dept. of Health & Social Services (1968), 37 Wis.2d 713, 721, 155 N.W.2d 549, 553, 157 N.W.2d 567. The court decided in the Plutshack Case that counsel should be provided for all indigent defendants who were charged with a crime which was p......
  • State v. Ritchie
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1970
    ...right to counsel in misdemeanor cases, see State ex rel. Plutshack v. State Department of H & S S (1968), 37 Wis.2d 713, 155 N.W.2d 549, 157 N.W.2d 567.2 State v. Russell (1958), 5 Wis.2d 196, 92 N.W.2d 210.3 Carnley v. Cochran (1962), 369 U.S. 506, 82 S.Ct. 884, 8 L.Ed.2d 70.4 (1967), 386 ......
  • Get Started for Free