State ex rel. Rice v. Large

Decision Date03 December 1934
Docket Number31470
Citation171 Miss. 330,157 So. 694
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE ex rel. RICE, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, v. LARGE

Division B

1. APPEAL AND ERROR.

No appeal is allowable from circuit court judgment unless judgment is in all respects a final judgment (Code 1930 secs. 13, 3361).

2. APPEAL AND ERROR.

In quo warranto proceeding, order ruling on demurrer, and which went no further than simply to rule on demurrer, was not appealable "final judgment" (Code 1930, secs. 13, 3361).

3. APPEAL AND ERROR.

Statute allowing interlocutory appeals applies only to chancery courts (Code 1930, sec. 14).

HON. J D. FATHEREE, Judge.

APPEAL from the circuit court of Wayne county HON. J. D. FATHEREE Judge.

Action by the state, on the relation of G. L. Rice, Attorney-General, against U.S. Large, in which an order was made allowing an appeal by plaintiff. Appeal dismissed.

See, also, 164 Miss. 318, 145 So. 346.

Appeal dismissed.

L. K. Saul, of Ellisville, for appellant.

The law requires that the appellee be eligible and qualified to hold the office at the time of his election and any subsquent qualification is not sufficient to entitle him to hold the office.

Section 6563, Code of 1930; State ex rel. v. McDonald, 164 Miss. 405, 145 So. 508; Raone v. Mathews, 75 Miss. 94; Covington v. Andrews, 69 Miss. 740; 56 C. J., p. 288, sec. 144.

The obtaining of the required certificate is a prerequisite and his election was void.

Wayne County v. Hopper, 114 Miss. 755, 75 So. 766; 56 C. J., p. 370, sec. 265, and page 417, sec. 366; Sections 6200 and 6202, Code of 1930.

A. G. Busby, of Waynesboro, for appellee.

The judgment where the court has jurisdiction of subject-matter and parties, its judgment is not alone res adjudicata of the questions specifically presented by the pleadings, but is also res adjudicata of all questions necessarily involved and which have been presented. The only way to question the law in case is to appeal in time allowed by law.

Scott County v. Dubois, 130 So. 106; Blates v. Strickland, 103 So. 432.

OPINION

Griffith, J.

An information in the nature of a quo warranto was filed by the attorney-general against appellee challenging the right of appellee to hold the office of superintendent of education of Wayne county. The defendant appeared and filed two special pleas, to each of which pleas the state demurred and the demurrers were overruled. No further steps were taken so far as appears of record and no final judgment was rendered by the court. But on the same day that the demurrers to the pleas were overruled, an application was made to the court to allow an appeal, and three days later an order was made allowing the appeal "to settle the principles of law involved in said suit."

No appeal is allowable from a circuit court judgment unless the judgment is in all respects a final judgment, sections 13, 3361, Code 1930, Moore v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 171 Miss. 420, 156 So. 875; and, of course, an order ruling on a demurrer, and which goes no further than simply to rule on the demurrer, is no final judgment, Pine Lbr. Co. v Covington County, 87 Miss. 706, 40 So. 260. The statute allowing interlocutory appeals, section 14, Code 1930, applies...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. Holland, 54413
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1984
    ...The interlocutory appeals statute was long ago held to apply only to actions heard in chancery court. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Rice v. Large, 171 Miss. 330, 157 So. 694 (1934). The statute, by its terms, applies only to chancery courts. We have nevertheless consistently refused to allow in......
  • Johnson v. Mississippi Power Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1940
    ...months next after the date upon which the judgment rendered by the circuit court becomes final. State ex rel. Rice, Atty.-General., v. Large, 157 So. 694; Moore v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 156 So. From the foregoing cases, it is apparent that so long as the time had not elapsed in which a mot......
  • Craig, State Tax Collector v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1940
    ... ... to both defendants. See, also, State ex rel. Rice, ... Attorney-General, v. Large, 171 Miss. 330, 157 So. 694, ... and Bank of Courtland v., ... ...
  • Texas Co. v. Smith County
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1934
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT