State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 14,598
| Court | Supreme Court of Louisiana |
| Writing for the Court | PROVOSTY, J. |
| Citation | 33 So. 793,109 La. 838 |
| Parties | STATE EX REL. SAUNDERS v. KOHNKE ET AL |
| Decision Date | 02 March 1903 |
| Docket Number | 14,598 |
33 So. 793
109 La. 838
STATE EX REL. SAUNDERS
v.
KOHNKE ET AL
No. 14,598
Supreme Court of Louisiana
March 2, 1903
OPINION [33 So. 807]
[109 La. 874] PROVOSTY, J.
On Application for Rehearing.
Our understanding of the scope of the writ of quo warranto herein is that it in no way, shape, or form brings in question the organization of the sewerage and water board under the act of 1899, or the authority of the members of that board as constituted under that act; but that it brings in question only and exclusively the right to membership in that board as sought to be derived from the act of 1902. So understanding, and now expressly so limiting the scope of the decree heretofore handed down, the court refuses the rehearing applied for.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 practice notes
-
Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans v. Splendour Shipping & Enterprises Co., Inc., No. 52156
...(Emphasis added). Duffy et al. v. City of New Orleans et al., 49 La.Ann. 114, 21 So. 179 (1896). But see explanation in State v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793, As alternative arguments, Splendour urges that the dock board has waived its immunity by having constructed a bridge within the n......
-
State ex rel. Porterie v. Walmsley, 33246
...but we feel justified in saying, at this time, that on the record now before us, and with the case of State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793, in mind, no infringement of any provision of the Constitution of the United States is involved in this suit. We will also say that......
-
Boise City National Bank v. Boise City
...Mich. 44, 9 Am. Rep. 103; People ex rel. Park Commissioners v. Detroit, 28 Mich. 228, 15 Am. Rep. 202; State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793; State ex rel. Atty. General v. Moores, 55 Neb. 480, 76 N.W. 175, 41 L. R. A. 624.) Regarding the insufficiency of the title to th......
-
Police Jury of Washington Parish v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners and Citizens of Indus. Dist. No. 1 of Washington Parish, No. 1
...195, 5 So.2d 547 (1941); State ex rel. Bahns v. City of New Orleans, 163 La. 777, 112 So. 718 (1927); State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793 (1903); Owen, The Need for Constitutional Revision in Louisiana, 8 La.L.Rev. 1 There is, in fact, no limitation upon the power of t......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans v. Splendour Shipping & Enterprises Co., Inc., No. 52156
...(Emphasis added). Duffy et al. v. City of New Orleans et al., 49 La.Ann. 114, 21 So. 179 (1896). But see explanation in State v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793, As alternative arguments, Splendour urges that the dock board has waived its immunity by having constructed a bridge within the n......
-
State ex rel. Porterie v. Walmsley, 33246
...but we feel justified in saying, at this time, that on the record now before us, and with the case of State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793, in mind, no infringement of any provision of the Constitution of the United States is involved in this suit. We will also say that......
-
Boise City National Bank v. Boise City
...Mich. 44, 9 Am. Rep. 103; People ex rel. Park Commissioners v. Detroit, 28 Mich. 228, 15 Am. Rep. 202; State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793; State ex rel. Atty. General v. Moores, 55 Neb. 480, 76 N.W. 175, 41 L. R. A. 624.) Regarding the insufficiency of the title to th......
-
Police Jury of Washington Parish v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners and Citizens of Indus. Dist. No. 1 of Washington Parish, No. 1
...195, 5 So.2d 547 (1941); State ex rel. Bahns v. City of New Orleans, 163 La. 777, 112 So. 718 (1927); State ex rel. Saunders v. Kohnke, 109 La. 838, 33 So. 793 (1903); Owen, The Need for Constitutional Revision in Louisiana, 8 La.L.Rev. 1 There is, in fact, no limitation upon the power of t......
Request a trial to view additional results