State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2007-1694.

Citation874 N.E.2d 536,2007 Ohio 5078,115 Ohio St.3d 1416
Decision Date02 October 2007
Docket Number2007-1694.
PartiesSTATE EX REL. TOLEDO BLADE CO. v. SENECA CTY. BD. OF COMMRS.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Ohio

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

Relator's brief and evidence is due within seven days from the date of this entry; respondent's brief and evidence is due within seven days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within three days after the filing of respondent's brief.

It is further ordered that relator's request for ancillary injunctive relief is denied.

PFEIFER, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.

O'CONNOR, J., not participating.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State ex rel. Toledo Blade v. Seneca Cty., 2007-1694.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • December 9, 2008
    ......After the board filed a motion to dismiss, we granted an alternative writ on the Blade's mandamus claim, but denied its request for ancillary injunctive relief. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 115 Ohio St.3d 1418, 2007-Ohio-5231, 874 N.E.2d 536. .          {¶ 12} After mediation proved unsuccessful, the case was returned to the regular docket, and oral argument was held. This cause is now before the court on the merits. . Ancillary Injunctive Relief .          {¶ ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT