State ex rel. Wernke v. Superior Court of Hendricks County
Decision Date | 15 June 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 376S91,376S91 |
Citation | 264 Ind. 646,348 N.E.2d 644 |
Parties | STATE of Indiana ex rel. Ray J. WERNKE, Relator, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF HENDRICKS COUNTY and Vincin Helton, Judge Superior Court, Hendricks County, Respondent. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
This is an original action for a writ of mandate and prohibition against the Superior Court of Hendricks County and its judge to compel the discharge of the petitioner under Criminal Rule 4(C) and prevent further action in the cause against him. The verified petition for the writ was filed on March 19, 1976. A hearing on the petition was held on March 29, 1976.
The petitioner, Ray J. Wernke, was charged on December 6, 1974, with the unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, marijuana. Arrested on December 6, the petitioner was arraigned in Hendricks County Superior Court on April 11, 1975. Trial was set for October 20, 1975. On October 17, 1975, the State moved to dismiss the cause on the grounds that the information erroneously charged delivery of marijuana when the delivery was actually of hashish. This motion was granted.
The petitioner was charged once more on October 30, 1975, by an information which specified the delivery of hashish. Following arrest of the petitioner and the posting of bond, arraignment was set for January 22, 1976. On January 20, 1976, the petitioner filed with the trial court a motion for discharge on the grounds that he had been held to answer on his criminal charge for more than a year and was entitled to discharge under Criminal Rule 4(C). This motion was denied on March 4, 1976. The petitioner was arraigned on March 10, at which time trial was set for March 22. These proceedings have been continued pending disposition of the petition before this court.
Criminal Rule 4(C) provides in part that (n)o person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later . . ..' While the two informations filed against the petitioner specified the delivery of different substances, the statutory definition of 'marijuana' includes 'hashish.' Ind.Code § 35--24.1--1--1 (Burns 1975). In calculating the year period under Criminal Rule 4(C), we will thus look to the date of the filing of the first information against the petitioner and his arrest, December 6, 1974.
Having determined this starting date in our calculations, there is no question that the year period had indeed run when the petitioner's motion for discharge was filed. We do not believe, however, that the petitioner was entitled to discharge. Examination of the facts reveals that the petitioner waived his right to discharge under Criminal Rule 4(C) and cannot now complain.
The obligation of a defendant to object at the earliest opportunity when his trial date is set beyond the time limits prescribed in Criminal Rule 4 is well-established. In Bryant v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 172, 301 N.E.2d 179, this court affirmed the denial of that defendant's motion for discharge. In addressing the six month rule prescribed in Criminal Rule 4(A), Justice Prentice wrote:
261 Ind. at 174, 301 N.E.2d at 180.
In Utterback v. State, (1974) Ind., 310 N.E.2d 552, we considered the applicability of this requirement to the speedy trial provisions of Criminal Rule 4(B). Justice Prentice again spoke for the court and compared the operation of subsections (A) and (B) of the rule:
In State ex rel. Wickliffe v. Judge of Criminal Court of Marion County, (1975) Ind., 328 N.E.2d 420, we addressed the issue of whether the Bryant and Utterback cases would apply to a situation in which a trial date had not yet been set. The contention that the defendant in that case could not object to a date that had not yet been set was rejected when it was found that he had acquiesced to the scheduling of a pretrial conference on a date...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Everroad v. State
....... No. 03A01-9005-CR-179. . Court of Appeals of Indiana, . First District. . April ... home of Norma Jean Everroad in Bartholomew County. Norma Jean, Nancy Calendar, Garnet, and Greg ... (1990), Ind., 555 N.E.2d 458, 461; State ex rel. O'Donnell v. Cass Superior Court (1984), Ind., ... State ex rel. Wernke v. Super. Ct. of Hendricks County (1976), 264 ......
-
Dean v. State
....... No. 580S122. . Supreme Court" of Indiana. . April 14, 1982. . Page 1174 . \xC2"... Page 1177 . N.E.2d 44, 46; State ex rel. Wernke v. Hendricks Superior Court, (1976) 264 ... to Daugherty, in a meeting at the Lake County Jail, in which he, Daugherty, and Defendants were ......
-
Martin v. State
......No. 1-1280A347. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. April 21, ... State ex rel. Wernke v. Superior Court of Hendricks County, ......
-
Burst v. State, 4-1185A304
....... No. 4-1185A304. . Court of Appeals of Indiana, . Fourth District. . Nov. ... began a six month sting operation in Perry County. Upon Hoover's request, the police provided him ...rel. Wernke v. Superior Court (1976), 264 Ind. 646, ......