State Farm County Mut. Ins. Co. of Texas v. Ollis

Decision Date11 January 1989
Docket NumberNo. C-7955,C-7955
Citation768 S.W.2d 722
PartiesSTATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, Petitioner, v. Dr. Phillip C. OLLIS, D.C., Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Mark C. Walker, Grambling & Mounce, El Paso, for petitioner.

James F. Scherr and Philip E. Kenrick, Law Offices of James F. Scherr, El Paso, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Phillip C. Ollis treated an automobile accident victim and received an assignment of the victim's rights to receive money from State Farm, but not an assignment of any part of the cause of action against the insured. Dr. Ollis then brought suit asserting his rights as the assignee of a third party beneficiary under a liability insurance policy issued by State Farm. The trial court granted summary judgment that Dr. Ollis recover $4,461.00 from State Farm County Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The court of appeals affirmed with one justice dissenting. 754 S.W.2d 781. In Great American Ins. Co. v. Murray, 437 S.W.2d 264 (Tex.1969), we held that a party injured by the insured is a third party beneficiary of a liability insurance policy. However, he cannot enforce the policy directly against the insurer until it has been established, by judgment or agreement, that the insured has a legal obligation to pay damages to the injured party. Id. at 265. Because the judgment of the court of appeals conflicts with this holding in Murray, a majority of the court reverses and, without argument, renders judgment that Dr. Ollis take nothing, pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 133(b).

State Farm issued a standard automobile liability insurance policy to Francisco Aldava. In the policy State Farm promises to pay damages "for which any covered person becomes legally responsible because of an auto accident." The policy further provides that no cause of action may be brought against State Farm, unless the liability of a covered person has been established by a judgment, or by written agreement with State Farm.

Mr. Aldava had an automobile accident with Eleno Hernandez. To pay for his medical treatment, Hernandez assigned to Dr. Ollis his right to receive sums payable from State Farm. Thereafter, Hernandez, Aldava, and State Farm entered into a settlement agreement. While denying liability, Aldava and State Farm paid $9,000.00 to Hernandez for his release of all claims arising out of the automobile accident.

Dr. Ollis brought suit directly against State Farm, alleging contractual theories...

To continue reading

Request your trial
64 cases
  • National American Ins. Co. v. Breaux
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • 6 Enero 2005
    ... ... United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division ... January 6, 2005 ... D-167,925 (136th Dist. Ct., Jefferson County, Tex., filed Sept. 5, 2002) ("the Underlying ... and existing under the laws of the State of Oklahoma, which has its principal place of ... 3 (citing Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Moak, 55 F.3d 1093, 1095 (5th ... , 133 F.3d 363, 369 (5th Cir.1998); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Vaughan, 968 S.W.2d 931, 933 ... See State Farm County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ollis, 768 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Tex.1989); Great Am. Ins ... ...
  • Cowley v. Texas Snubbing Control, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi
    • 8 Diciembre 1992
    ... ... 15445, in the Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi and all other Similarly Situated ... pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. That ... on the contract, see Dairyland County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Childress, 650 S.W.2d 770, 775-76 ... be sued directly in tort suit); State Farm County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ollis, 768 S.W.2d 722, ... ...
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Traver
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 31 Diciembre 1998
    ... ... Davidson, Respondent ... No. 96-1201 ... Supreme Court of Texas ... Argued April 24, 1997 ... Decided Dec. 31, 1998 ...         Anne Gardner, Lori ... The court of appeals reversed in part. It held that, under the language of Ranger County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Guin, 723 S.W.2d 656, 659 (Tex.1987), State Farm was responsible for any ... ...
  • 15625 Ft. Bend Ltd. v. Sentry Select Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 13 Marzo 2014
    ... ... United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 13, 2014 ... a/k/a Timmy Tieu (“Tieu”), removed from state court on diversity jurisdiction, are Sentry's ... the parties will not defeat an otherwise Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Gutterman, 896 F.2d 116, 118 ... 400th Judicial District Court, Fort Bend County, Texas, and obtained a judgment in ... Co. of Texas v. Ollis", 768 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Tex.1989) (        \xC2" ... 36 (Tex.2007), citing Progressive County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Boyd, 177 S.W.3d 919, 922 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 6 - 6-3 Procedure
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Texas Discovery Title Chapter 6 Disclosures—Texas Rule 194
    • Invalid date
    ...to the contrary, a 'settlement agreement does nothing more than buy peace.'" (quoting State Farm Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. of Tex. v. Ollis, 768 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Tex. 1989) (per curiam))). [178] Former Tex. R. Civ. P. 194.2(i); Tex. R. Civ. P. 194.2(b)(9).[179] Tex. R. Civ. P. 192.3(h).[180] Tex.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT