State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Bass, s. 91-818

Decision Date08 September 1992
Docket Number91-1612,Nos. 91-818,s. 91-818
CitationState Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Bass, 605 So.2d 908 (Fla. App. 1992)
Parties17 Fla. L. Week. D2101 STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, and Nancy E. Tallarico, Appellants, v. Elvira BASS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Randelle J. Huggins, Deceased, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Barnett, Clark and Barnard, and James K. Clark, Miami, for appellants.

Joe N. Unger, and Lars Lundeen, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendants, State Farm Insurance Company[State Farm] and Nancy Tallarico, appeal from a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Elvira Bass, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Randelle J. Huggins.Bass cross-appeals from the trial court's order denying her motion for attorney's fees and costs.We affirm as to both the main appeal and cross-appeal.

On April 27, 1984, Tallarico, a State Farm insurance agent, contacted Bass at the request of a mortgage company in connection with the purchase of a new home by Bass and her son, Huggins.At that time, Bass inquired about purchasing life insurance for herself and her son.Tallarico accepted an application from Bass, who had a complicated medical history, but did not offer to write a separate policy for Huggins, the son, who was in good health.Bass paid no premium at the time the application was accepted.As Tallarico left that evening, she told Bass that she would take care of the application.

After speaking with Tallarico on April 27, 1984, Bass was contacted by representatives of two other insurance companies.Bass, however, did not attempt to obtain life insurance from these companies because she had confidence that she and her son had life insurance with State Farm.

Bass supplied additional medical information to State Farm and, at State Farm's request, underwent a medical examination.State Farm, however, did not request any further information from Huggins.

Bass did not hear from Tallarico until August 17, 1984, when Tallarico called her and informed her that the policy was ready and that she would have it delivered to her.On August 24th, Bass called Tallarico since the policy had not been delivered as promised.Tallarico told Bass that she would bring the policy over that evening.During this conversation, Tallarico informed Bass that the policy was to be issued at an increased premium because of her medical condition.Bass was prepared for the increase and had money available to pay the policy that evening.Once again, Tallarico failed to deliver the policy to Bass.On August 31st, Bass called Tallarico, but was not able to get into contact with Tallarico.

On September 10th, Bass called Tallarico and requested that the policy be delivered.Tallarico delivered the policy; however, Huggins had died the day before.

When demand was made on State Farm for the death benefits, State Farm denied coverage on the basis that the insurance application was nonbinding and the application required that an insured be living at the time the policy was delivered.Bass sued State Farm for breach of an oral and written contract to deliver the policy prior to September 9, 1984, the date Huggins died, and for negligence.

Prior to trial, Bass filed an offer of judgment.The offer of judgment stated, in part, that it was "in the amount of $64,000.00 [the policy amount], exclusive of costs and attorney's fees.Costs and attorney's fees would be agreed to or determined by the court at a later date."State Farm and Tallarico did not accept the offer, and therefore, the case proceeded to trial.

At trial, David Goodwin, an insurance agent and consultant, testified as an expert.He testified that from the time the application was originally taken, considering Bass' medical history, Tallarico should have suggested a separate policy for Huggins.If a separate policy had been suggested, it could have been issued, paid for, and promptly delivered while further underwriting investigation continued as to Bass.Also,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Hill v. Chubb Life American Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • April 20, 1995
    ...a tort or contract duty to timely process an application absent a premium. They apparently overlooked State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Bass, 605 So.2d 908, 910 (Fla.App.1992) ("An insurer who undertakes to obtain an insurance policy owes the proposed insured a duty to act within a reasonable tim......
  • Perez v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 25, 1998
    ...costs may be incidental for jurisdictional purposes, they are not incidental for settlement purposes. In State Farm Life Insurance Co. v. Bass, 605 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), we held that in order for a plaintiff to preserve his entitlement to attorney's fees, the plaintiff's demand must......
  • McMahan v. Toto
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • November 6, 2002
    ...excludes attorney's fees, it is invalid because the total amount of the proposal is not stated. See State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Bass, 605 So.2d 908, 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding offer of judgment stating that attorney's fees and costs were to be determined at a later date did not satisfy......
  • White v. Steak and Ale of Florida, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 18, 2002
    ...to apples. This was the reasoning of the Third District in Perez,6 which the majority claims to approve: In State Farm Life Insurance Co. v. Bass, 605 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), we held that in order for a plaintiff to preserve his entitlement to attorney's fees, the plaintiff's demand m......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Statutory offers of settlement in Florida practice: uses, problems, and solutions.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 80 No. 3, March 2006
    • March 1, 2006
    ...basis for sanctions since both entitlement and amount of attorney fee issues would have remained). (16) State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Bass, 605 So. 2d 908, 909 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1992) (offer of judgment "exclusive of costs and attorneys' fees" "be agreed to or determined by the court at a later......