State Historical Soc. of Wisconsin v. Village of Maple Bluff, 81-2292

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Citation332 N.W.2d 792,112 Wis.2d 246
Docket NumberNo. 81-2292,81-2292
PartiesThe STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN, a body politic and corporate, State of Wisconsin Investment Board, a body corporate, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. VILLAGE OF MAPLE BLUFF, a municipal corporation, and First Wisconsin National Bank of Madison, a national banking association, Defendants-Appellants.
Decision Date26 April 1983

Page 792

332 N.W.2d 792
112 Wis.2d 246
The STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN, a body politic
and corporate, State of Wisconsin Investment
Board, a body corporate, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
VILLAGE OF MAPLE BLUFF, a municipal corporation, and First
Wisconsin National Bank of Madison, a national
banking association, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 81-2292.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Argued March 30, 1983.
Decided April 26, 1983.

[112 Wis.2d 247] Ronald W. Todd, Madison (argued), for defendants-appellants; Stroud, Stroud, Willink, Thompson & Howard, Madison, on brief.

Charles A. Bleck, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), for plaintiffs-respondents; Bronson C. La Follette, Atty. Gen., on brief.

STEINMETZ, Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of sec. 893.15, Stats. (1977) 1 (now sec. 893.33),

Page 793

commonly[112 Wis.2d 248] referred to as the thirty-year statute. Specifically, we are being asked to interpret the public entity exception to the statute. That exception states "nor does [112 Wis.2d 249] this section apply to any real estate or interest therein while the record title thereto remains in the state or any political subdivision or municipal corporation thereof." 2

The facts of this case are not disputed by the parties. On March 16, 1918, the trustee under the will of George B. Burrows conveyed a parcel of real estate 250 feet by 300 feet to the Joint School District No. 1 of the Towns of Madison and Burke. The deed contained a reversionary clause, which provided:

"It is part of the consideration for the sale and conveyance of said premises, that the premises shall be used solely for school purposes and other matters usually incident thereto, and for no other purpose whatever, and that in the event of the use of said premises for any other than for the purposes aforesaid, the said party of the first part shall be at liberty to return to said party of the second part the purchase money for said premises, but without interest thereon, and upon such return to have and to receive from the party of the second part, its successors or assigns, a re-conveyance to him, his successors or assigns of the premises hereinbefore described,[112 Wis.2d 250] and that thereupon

Page 794

the conveyance by the said party of the first part to the said party of the second part shall be cancelled and held for naught."

The deed was properly recorded on July 1, 1922.

On June 22, 1922, final judgment was entered in the trust estate which assigned the trust property to the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. The final judgment described, in the form of a recital, numerous items of personal property and many parcels of real estate comprising the trust estate. It did not specifically list the reversionary right mentioned in the 1918 deed, but did assign to the State Historical Society "all the rest and residue of said trust estate, of whatever nature or kind or wherever situated in the possession or control of said trustee ...." The final judgment was recorded on January 17, 1923.

On July 1, 1962, Joint School District No. 1 was taken over by the Madison City School District. Title to the property was held by the city of Madison. On April 24, 1978, the Madison City School District, by then known as the Madison Metropolitan School District, declared the property "surplus." On June 7, 1979, following various meetings and letters, the State Historical Society tendered $3,800 to the Madison Metropolitan School District and demanded conveyance of the property to the State Historical Society. The demand was refused.

On July 27, 1979, the Village of Maple Bluff entered into a contract with the Madison Metropolitan School District to purchase the property and the adjoining real estate for $164,900, and on December 11, 1979, the purchase was completed. On December 12, 1979, a deed from the city of Madison to the defendant village of Maple Bluff was recorded and the village's purchase money mortgage to the defendant First Wisconsin National Bank of Madison was recorded. No instrument or notice referring to the existence of the claim of the State Historical [112 Wis.2d 251] Society has appeared on record subsequent to the recording of the original deed in 1922. On January 24, 1980, the plaintiff State Historical Society commenced this action seeking a declaration of its rights in the real estate in question. On July 29, 1980, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which contended in part that the plaintiffs were barred from asserting their claim under the 1918 deed because of the provisions of sec. 893.15, Stats. (1977).

The trial court ruled that the real estate in question was not subject to the provisions of sec. 893.15, Stats. (1977), because record title to the real estate was in a municipal corporation, hence the real estate was excepted from the statute. This court accepted the defendants' appeal on certification from the court of appeals.

The sole issue for determination in this appeal is whether the defendant can use the provisions of sec. 893.15, Stats. (1977) to bar the plaintiffs' claim to real estate under the 1918 deed. To phrase it another way, the issue is whether the exception listed in sec. 893.15(4) for real estate owned by public entities is intended only as a protection for the public entity by allowing it to bring claims which are older than thirty years; or whether the exception for real estate owned by public entities also bars the public entities from raising the statute as a defense against claims of others which are older than thirty years.

It is important to state the issues we are not concerned with on this appeal. First, we are not dealing with the question of whether the State Historical Society itself is an excepted public entity under sec. 893.15(4), Stats. (1977). The trial court did not consider that issue and the parties have removed it from appeal by stipulation. Second, we are not concerned with the question of whether the plaintiffs are the owners of the reversionary interest under the Burrow's will. The trial court did not decide this issue, and the parties have also removed this [112 Wis.2d 252] issue from the appeal by stipulation. With these questions removed, we only need to discuss the issue of whether the public entity exception bars the defendants from arguing that the plaintiffs' claim is older than thirty years.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • State ex rel. Wisconsin Senate v. Thompson, 87-1750-OA
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • June 14, 1988
    ...the situation where the court must ascertain legislative intent for a statutory enactment, cf. State Historical Society v. Maple Bluff, 112 Wis.2d 246, 255, 332 N.W.2d 792 (1983), this contemporaneously written account of what Witte thought the proposed constitutional amendment meant, is no......
  • Salveson v. Douglas County, 99-0946.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
    • March 28, 2000
    ...the legislative intent reflected by that language without recourse to collateral sources. See State Historical Soc'y v. Maple Bluff, 112 Wis. 2d 246, 252, 332 N.W.2d 792 ¶ 38. We are not convinced, however, that the statute clearly and unambiguously indicates that the current calendar year ......
  • City of Madison v. Town of Fitchburg, 82-1218
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • June 1, 1983
    ...must be given their obvious and intended meaning. Wis. Bankers Ass'n v. Mut. Savings & Loan, 96 Wis.2d 438, 450, 291 N.W.2d 869 (1980)." 112 Wis.2d 246, 332 N.W.2d 792 (1983), p. 3 See, e.g., sec. 6.78(1) (polls); 43.54(1) (library board); 62.08 (size of wards); 62.13(7), (7m) (compensation......
  • Mogilka v. Jeka, 85-0912
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
    • April 16, 1986
    ...statutory construction, the initial inquiry is to the plain meaning of the statute. State Historical Society v. Village of Maple Bluff, 112 Wis.2d 246, 252, 332 N.W.2d 792, 795 (1983). If the statute is unambiguous, resort to judicial rules of interpretation and construction is not permitte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT