State in Interest of D.S., In re

Decision Date23 October 1973
Citation310 A.2d 460,63 N.J. 541
PartiesIn re STATE of New Jersey In the Interest of D.S., Juvenile-Appellant.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

David R. Arrajj, Asst. Deputy Public Defender, for appellant (Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, atty., William E. Norris, Asst. Deputy Public Defender, of counsel, David R. Arrajj, on the brief.)

Kenneth Ply, Asst. Pros. for State of New Jersey (Joseph P. Lordi, Essex Co. Pros., atty.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed essentially for the reasons given by Judge Botter in his dissenting opinion, reported at 125 N.J.Super. 278, 310 A.2d 506 (App.Div.1973).

For reversal: Justices JACOGS, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD, and Judge CONFORD--5.

For affirmance: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Williams
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • September 4, 1991
    ...such as the glassine envelopes containing heroin which were discovered in the search dealt with in In re State in the Interest of D.S., 63 N.J. 541 (1973) ... To the end of such emphasis we repeat and adopt the language of the Appellate Division: "[T]he principles applied herein are viable ......
  • State in Interest of H.B.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1977
    ...material such as the glassine envelopes containing heroin which were discovered in the search dealt with in In re State in Interest of P.S., 63 N.J. 541, 310 A.2d 460 (1973). To the end of such emphasis we repeat and adopt the language of the Appellate (T)he principles applied herein are vi......
  • State v. Lakomy
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • February 1, 1974
    ...conduct but does not project a threat of physical danger which may require self-protection, as in In re State in the Interest of D.S., 63 N.J. 541, 310 A.2d 460, reversing on dissenting opinion below 125 N.J.Super. 278, 310 A.2d 506 (App.Div.1973). It may be further contrasted with full sea......
  • State in Interest of A.R.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • March 24, 1987
    ...Fourth Amendment protections are concerned.2 The search could not be justified as a protective search. See In re State in Interest of D.S., 63 N.J. 541, 310 A.2d 460 (1973), reversing on Judge Botter's dissent, 125 N.J.Super. 278, 283, 286-287, 310 A.2d 506 ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT