State Mut. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n of N.J. v. Batterson

Citation71 A. 115,77 N.J.L. 57
PartiesSTATE MUT. BUILDING & LOAN ASS'N OF NEW JERSEY v. BATTERSON.
Decision Date09 November 1908
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Motion by James G. Batterson to open a judgment entered against him by the State Mutual Building & Loan Association of New Jersey upon a bond and warrant of attorney. Motion denied.

Argued June term, 1908, before GARRISON, SWAYZE, and PARKER, JJ.

Francis Scott, for the rule.

Harvey F. Carr, opposed.

SWAYZE, J. This is a motion to open a judgment entered upon a bond and warrant of attorney. The bond was secured by a mortgage, which was foreclosed. The case is reported in 67 N. J. Eq. 595, 59 Atl. 469. It was there held that the mortgage did not secure the premiums, fines, and charges, for the payment of which, together with the principal and interest, the bond was conditioned. In every other respect the decree in favor of the complainant in the foreclosure suit was sustained. Judgment was then entered upon the bond, by virtue of the warrant of attorney, for the penalty of the bond; and it is this judgment which the defendant now seeks to set aside. This method of entering the judgment has been already sustained by this court. Earl v. Jenkins, 42 N. J. Law, 416, 58 Atl. 1086. It is urged, however, that the bond in the present case is not such a bond as is contemplated by the act directing the mode of entering judgment on bonds with warrants of attorney to confess judgments (Gen. St. 1905, p. 172), for the reason that section 5 limits the right of the obligee to apply for the entry of judgment pursuant to the warrant, to a time after the day of payment mentioned in the bond. The bond in this case provides for the payment of the moneys secured, at such time, in such places, and in such installments as now are, or may hereafter be, required by the Constitution, by-laws, and regulations of the obligee. It contains also a special provision that, if default is made in the payment of interest and principal, premiums, fines, charges, or tax, for the space of 30 days after the same shall first become payable then the whole principal debt shall, at the option of the obligee, become due and payable immediately; and payment of said principal debt, and all interest thereon, may be enforced, and recovered at once, anything contained in the bond to the contrary notwithstanding. It is not denied that there had been default, and that the 30 days had elapsed, so that the whole amount became due at the option of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Harnischfeger Sales Corporation v. Sternberg Dredging Co
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1940
    ... ... 13, 31 L. R. A. (N ... S.) 1023; State Mut. Bl. & L. Assn. v. Batterson, 77 ... N. J ... 432, 144 So. 238; ... Collister v. Loan Assn., 44 Ariz. 427, 38 P.2d 626, ... 98 A. L ... ...
  • Friendly Consumer Discount Co. v. Foell
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • March 12, 1956
    ...supra) it is held that a judgment by confession may not be entered with respect to an unmatured debt. Cf. State Mutual B. & L. Ass'n v. Batterson, 77 N.J.L. 57, 71 A. 115 (Sup.Ct.1908); but cf. Huck-Gerhardt Co. v. Parreca, 154 A. 870, 9 N.J.Misc. 563, 565 (Sup.Ct.1931), distinguishing Flem......
  • Crest Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Mason
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • February 8, 1990
    ...complainant, no fines for nonpayment would be reasonable. [Id. at 286] To the same effect is State Mut. Building and Loan Ass'n of New Jersey v. Batterson, 77 N.J.L. 57, 71 A. 115 (Sup.Ct.1908). Of interest on the issue of late charges after the filing of the complaint is a guideline of the......
  • U.S. Bank N.A. v. Bailey
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 17, 2019
    ...compensation for administrative expenses in connection with alleged late payments." Ibid.; see State Mut. Bldg. and Loan Ass'n of New Jersey v. Batterson, 77 N.J.L. 57, 59 (Sup. Ct. 1908) (providing that "fines should cease with the commencement of the foreclosure suit"). Crest did not invo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT