State Nat. Bank v. Smith
Decision Date | 23 May 1899 |
Docket Number | 794. |
Citation | 94 F. 605 |
Parties | STATE NAT. BANK OF FT. WORTH, TEX., v. SMITH. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
This action was brought by John P. Smith, receiver of the City National Bank of Ft. Worth, Tex., to recover of the State National Bank of Ft. Worth and John C. Harrison the sum of $6,000 and 10 per cent. interest per annum thereon from July 10, 1896. The petition alleged, in substance, that the State National Bank of Ft. Worth was, at the date of the failure of the City National Bank, the legal and equitable owner and holder of 60 shares of the capital stock of said bank; that said City National Bank became insolvent on the 4th day of April, 1895, and on said date a national bank examiner, by order of the comptroller of the currency of the United States, took charge of the bank; that defendant in error John P. Smith, was appointed receiver of said insolvent bank on the 12th day of April, 1895; that on the 10th day of July 1896, the comptroller of the currency made an assessment on the shareholders of said bank of $100 per share for each and every share of the capital stock held and owned by them respectively at the time of its failure; that said 60 shares of stock were issued to said John C. Harrison, as trustee, in two certificates, of date, respectively, Jun 28 and November 2, 1894, numbered 86c, for 50 shares, and 96c, for 10 shares that said stock was so issued to said Harrison for the use benefit, and advantage of said State National Bank, plaintiff in error, and he took the same in his name, as trustee for said bank; and that all said stock and certificates for same appeared on the books of the City National Bank in the name of John C. Harrison, trustee. The petition contained all proper allegations to entitle plaintiff to a recovery against the State National Bank if the ownership of the stock was as alleged in it at the date of the failure of the other bank. The defendants in the court below, John C. Harrison and the State National Bank, by their answer, denied ownership of the stock mentioned, and alleged substantially that 50 shares of the same were pledged to the bank by one Garner as security for a debt owing by him to it, and that the other 10 shares were pledged to it by A. W. and H. C. Caswell to secure a debt owing by them to the bank; that said stock, as well as the dividends arising therefrom, were pledged to the bank, and that, to protect it and the City National Bank against conflicting claims of other creditors of said pledgors, new certificates of said stock were issued to John C. Harrison, trustee, respectively on June 28, 1894, and November 2, 1894; that said stock, since said dates, has appeared on the books of the City National Bank in the name of John C. Harrison, trustee, and has never at any time appeared in the name of the State National Bank; and that the State National Bank at no time became the owner of any of said shares of stock, and never had any interest in the same, except as pledgee to secure said debts. On the trial, the parties, by agreement in writing, waived a jury, and the cause was submitted to the court without a jury. October 15, 1898, a judgment was rendered for plaintiff against the State National Bank of Ft. Worth for the sum of $6,815 and costs of suit, and in favor of defendant John C. Harrison that plaintiff take nothing as to him, and that he go hence without day, and recover his costs. After the rendition of the judgment, the defendant below moved the court to find a special verdict as to the facts proved on the trial of said cause which are material to the issue raised by the pleadings, and to find a certain conclusion of law in favor of the defendant. This motion appears to have been granted so far as it sought to have a special verdict on the facts proven on the trial of said cause prepared and filed, and also so far as it sought to have the court find its conclusions of law. Thereafter there is in the record, of date October,--, 1898, the following, entitled 'Special Findings of Fact':
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. Lombard
... ... CHESHIRE PROVIDENT INST. SAME v. KEENE FIVE CENT SAV. BANK. Nos. 1858-1861. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. July 16, ... corporations organized under the laws of that state, and to ... enforce a claimed unpaid subscription to additional stock ... 499, 512, 13 Sup.Ct. 148, 36 L.Ed ... 1059; Lindsay v. First Nat. Bank, 156 U.S. 485, 493, ... 15 Sup.Ct. 472, 39 L.Ed. 505; Davis v ... Whittier, 33 C.C.A. 658, 91 F ... 511; State Nat'l Bank v. Smith, 36 C.C.A. 412, ... 416, 94 F. 605; American Nat's Bank v. Watkins, ... ...
-
Babbitt Bros. Trading Co. v. New Home Sewing Mach. Co.
...etc., Min. Co., 139 U. S. 222, 11 S. Ct. 523, 35 L. Ed. 147; Corliss v. Pulaski County (C. C. A.) 116 F. 289; State Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. Smith (C. C. A.) 94 F. 605; Streeter v. Sanitary Dist. of Chicago (C. C. A.) 133 F. 124; U. S. v. Cleage (C. C. A.) 161 F. 85. It should be stated al......
-
Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank
...are sufficient to support the judgment. Corliss v. Pulaski County, 116 F. 289 (C. C. A. 7th, 1902). See State National Bank of Ft. Worth v. Smith, 94 F. 605, 608 (C. C. A. 5th, 1899). This is, of course, so when the special findings are never entered upon the record, United States v. Cleage......
-
Ozark Pipe Line Corporation v. Decker
...of Key West v. Baer (C. C. A.) 66 F. 440, 444; Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Board of County Com'rs. (C. C. A.) 79 F. 575, 576; State Nat. Bank v. Smith (C. C. A.) 94 F. 605, 609; Consolidated Coal Co. v. Polar Wave Ice Co. (C. C. A.) 106 F. 798, 799; Berwind-White Coal Min. Co. v. Martin (C. C. A.......