State of California ex rel. Bartlett v. Miller
| Docket Number | B259472 |
| Decision Date | 19 January 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
-
Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp.
... ... the trial court properly admitted the defendant's evidence of the state of the art of helicopter design. The court distinguished admissible ... ...
-
Riske v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty.
...v. One2One Learning Foundation (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1164, 1190, 48 Cal.Rptr.3d 108, 141 P.3d 225 ; State ex rel. Bartlett v. Miller (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1398, 1408, 197 Cal.Rptr.3d 673.) When the language allows for more than one reasonable construction, we consider "such aids as the legisla......
-
Rosenberg v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
...false claims act. See Edelweiss Fund, Cal. Super. Ct., No. CGC-14-540777, supra at 8-9, citing State ex rel. Bartlett v. Miller, 243 Cal. App. 4th 1398, 1414, 197 Cal.Rptr.3d 673 (2016) ; note 10, supra. There, unlike here, the court was bound by State appellate precedent that summarily hel......
-
Berney Law Corp. v. ClubCorp Porter Valley Country Club, Inc.
...(d)(3)(A)'s public disclosure bar (see State ex rel. Bartlett v. Miller (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1398, 1407-1408, 1410-1414) (State ex rel Bartlett), remanded for further proceedings (id. at p. 1415). 2. Settlement and Dismissal of Bartlett's Action Against ClubCorp In March 2017, following i......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Delaware jury finds retailer liable for gift card breakage in qui tam escheat litigation
...ex rel. Springfield Terminal Ry. Co. v. Quinn, 14 F.3d 645, 646 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 1994). 6See, e.g., California ex rel. Bartlett v. Miller, 243 Cal. App. 4th 1398, 1411 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). 7See, e.g., Jack Trachtenberg, Jeffrey A. Friedman & Eric S. Tresh, Applying False Claims Acts in S......