State of California v. State of Washington
Decision Date | 10 November 1958 |
Docket Number | O,No. 12,12 |
Citation | 358 U.S. 64,79 S.Ct. 116,3 L.Ed.2d 106 |
Parties | STATE OF CALIFORNIA, plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. riginal |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Wallace Howland, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California (Messrs. Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen. and Leonard M. Sperry, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Messrs. John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington and Thomas R. Carlington(Mr. Franklin K. Thorp, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief), for defendant.
Messrs. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. and Paxton Blair, Sol.Gen. for State of New York, as amicus curiae.
On motion for leave to file bill of complaint.
The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is denied.U.S.Const. Amend. XXI, § 2;Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control Commission, 305 U.S. 391, 59 S.Ct. 254, 83 L.Ed. 243;Joseph S. Finch & Co. v. McKittrick, 305 U.S. 395, 59 S.Ct. 256, 83 L.Ed. 246;Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401, 58 S.Ct. 952, 82 L.Ed. 1424;State Board of Equalization of California v. Young's Market Co., 299 U.S. 59, 57 S.Ct. 77, 81 L.Ed. 38.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corporation
...or prevent the traffic and distribution of intoxicants within its borders has remained unquestioned. See California v. Washington, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106. Thus, in Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 128, there was involved a Kentucky statute, 'a ......
-
California v. Rue
...of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co., 377 U.S. 341, 344, 346, 84 S.Ct. 1247, 1249, 1250, 12 L.Ed.2d 362; California v. Washington, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106; Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 128; Mahoney v. Joseph Triner, Corp., 304 U.S. 401......
-
American Travelers Club, Inc. v. Hostetter
...59 S.Ct. at 255, 83 L.Ed. 243 (this case, along with Triner and Finch, was cited by the Supreme Court in California v. Washington, 1958, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106). Cf. State Board of Equalization v. Young's Market Co., supra, 299 U.S. at 64, 57 S.Ct. at 79, 81 L.Ed. 38 (also......
-
Reynolds v. Louisiana Bd. of Alcoholic Beverage Control
...the traffic and distribution of intoxicants within its borders has remained unquestioned. See (State of) California v. (State of) Washington, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106. Thus, in Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 128, there was involved a Kentucky s......
-
Does The California Department Of Alcoholic Beverage Control Have Exclusive Jurisdiction Over All Disputes Involving The Sale Of Alcohol?
...Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324, 330 (same); Dept. of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co., 377 U.S. 341, 344, (same); California v. Washington, 358 U.S. 64 (same); Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132 (same); Mahoney v. Joseph Triner, Corp., 304 U.S. 401 (same); State Board of Equali......