State of California v. United States, 13018.
| Citation | 195 F.2d 530 |
| Decision Date | 17 May 1952 |
| Docket Number | No. 13018.,13018. |
| Parties | STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California Polytechnic School and California State Board of Equalization, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., James E. Sabine, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward Sumner, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of California, for appellants.
Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., A. F. Prescott, Fred E. Youngman, Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Walter S. Binns, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Edward R. McHale, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and YANKWICH, District Judge.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, United States v. Graham, D.C.S.D.Cal., 96 F.Supp. 318, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Hollywood Baseball Ass'n v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 93647.
... ... 93647. Tax Court of the United States. Filed April 21, 1964 ... [42 T.C. 234] ... , was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California on December 8, 1938. From December 8, 1938, ... ...
-
In re M & T Elec. Contractors, Inc.
...(S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 603 F.2d 213 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Graham, 96 F.Supp. 318 (S.D.Cal.1951), aff'd sub nom. California v. United States, 195 F.2d 530 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 831, 73 S.Ct. 36, 97 L.Ed. 647 (1952). This is even the rule under § Singleton could have prote......
-
Rosenberg's Will, In re
...the property, the federal tax lien receives priority (United States v. Graham, D.C., 96 F.Supp. 318, affd. sub nom. California v. United States, D.C., 195 F.2d 530, cert. den. 344 U.S. 831, 73 S.Ct. 36, 97 L.Ed. 647; Matter of Oxford Dist. Co. Inc. v. Famous Robert's, Inc., 5 A.D.2d 507, 17......
-
McDermott v. Zions First Nat. Bank, N.A.
...The authority for that proposition was United States v. Graham, 96 F.Supp. 318 (S.D.Cal.1951), aff'd sub nom. State of California v. United States, 195 F.2d 530 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 831, 73 S.Ct. 36, 97 L.Ed. 647 (1952). The Graham holding rested on the fact that the state's r......
Request a trial to view additional results