State of Connecticut v. Gibson
| Decision Date | 30 June 2009 |
| Citation | 973 A.2d 1276,292 Conn. 916 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. Gary D. GIBSON. |
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn.App. 295, 969 A.2d 784 (2009), is granted, limited to the following issue:
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18402.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. Gibson
...Court properly conclude that the alleged impropriety deprived the defendant of the due process right to a fair trial?” State v. Gibson, 292 Conn. 916, 973 A.2d 1276 (2009). We conclude that the prosecutor's remarks were not improper and, accordingly, we reverse in part the judgment of the A......
-
State v. Zillo
..."I think" in this case to the use of those same words in State v. Gibson, 114 Conn.App. 295, 309, 969 A.2d 784, cert. granted, 292 Conn. 916, 973 A.2d 1276 (2009), in which we found such use to be improper. In Gibson, the prosecutor had asked rhetorical questions of the jury and then answer......
-
State Of Conn. v. Zillo
...think'' in this case to the use of those same words in State v. Gibson, 114 Conn. App. 295, 309, 969 A.2d 784, cert. granted, 292 Conn. 916, 973 A.2d 1276 (2009), in which we found such use to be improper. In Gibson, the prosecutor had asked rhetorical questions of the jury and then answere......
-
State v. Gibson
...properly conclude that the alleged impropriety deprived the defendant of the due process right to a fair trial?'' State v. Gibson, 292 Conn. 916, 973 A.2d 1276 (2009). We conclude that the prosecutor's remarks were not improper and, accordingly, we reverse in part the judgment of the Appell......