State of La. ex rel. Guste v. Verity, 88-3185
| Citation | 850 F.2d 211 |
| Decision Date | 11 July 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-3185,88-3185 |
| Parties | STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. William J. GUSTE, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs- Appellants, and Concerned Shrimpers of Louisiana, Intervenor-Appellant, v. C. William VERITY, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Commerce, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and The Environmental Defense Fund, Intervenor-Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
John B. Sheppard, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., William G. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for State of La.
Eric F. Skrmetta, William L. Von Hoene, Jr., Von Hoene & Skrmetta, New Orleans, La., for Concerned Shrimpers.
John Volz, U.S. Atty., S. Mark Gallinghouse, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.
Vicki L. Plaut, Peter R. Steenland, Jr., Dept. of Justice, David J. Hayes, Washington, D.C., for C. William Verity.
Gerald E. Meunier, New Orleans, La., Barbara E. Pace, Washington, D.C., for Environmental Defense Fund.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Patrick E. Carr, Judge.
Before GEE, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
For reasons to be assigned in an opinion to be issued in due course, the judgment of the district court dismissing this action is AFFIRMED. The district court's order staying execution of its judgment is VACATED effective 11:59 p.m., August 31, 1988. If appellants wish to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States for a further stay of judgment or for other relief, application should be made during the pendency of the stay as announced herein, as no further stays will be granted by this court.
SO ORDERED.
* See 853 F.2d 322.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State of La., ex rel. Guste v. Verity
...district court entered summary judgment for the defendants. Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. Verity, 681 F.Supp. 1178 (E.D.La.), aff'd, 850 F.2d 211 (5th Cir.1988). On April 12, 1988, a stay pending appeal was issued. In the present appeal, the appellants again argue that the regulations are arbi......
-
Blue v. U.S. Dept. of Army
... ... even a fine and reprimand of counsel for violation of state ethical rules. While the district court's approach ... ...
-
Chapman & Cole v. Itel Container Intern. B.V.
... ... The lease was later amended to state it would begin on February 1, 1981 and end on January 31, ... ...
-
Louisiana State v. Department of Commerce
...in and ownership of its marine resources." State of La. ex rel. Guste v. Verity , 681 F. Supp. 1178, 1181 (E.D. La.), aff'd , 850 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1988).20 84 Fed. Reg. 70,048 (Dec. 20, 2019).21 Final Environmental Impact Statement, Doc. 14-13.22 Texas v. United States, 524 F.Supp.3d 598,......