State of Georgia v. State of South Carolina, 16

Decision Date05 June 1922
Docket NumberNo. 16,O,16
Citation66 L.Ed. 1069,259 U.S. 572,42 S.Ct. 597
PartiesSTATE OF GEORGIA v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. riginal
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Decree declaring location of interstate boundary.

This cause came on to be heard by this court, and for the purpose of carrying into effect the conclusions of the court as stated in its opinion herein. 257 U. S. 516, 42 Sup. Ct. 173, 66 L. Ed. 347.

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the boundary between the states of Georgia and South Carolina is and shall be the rivers Savannah, Tugaloo, and Chattooga to the point where the latter river touches the North Carolina line at the thirty-fifth parallel of north latitude, and the location of the boundary line between said states is hereby established and declared to be as set forth in the opinion of the court as follows:

First. Where there are no islands in the boundary rivers the location of the line between the two states is on the water midway between the main banks of the river when water is at ordinary stage.

Second. Where there are islands, the line is midway between the island bank and the South Carolina shore when the water is at ordinary stage.

Third. That all islands formed by nature in the Chattooga river are reserved to Georgia as completely as are those in the Savannah and Tugaloo rivers.

Fourth. That the parties to this suit may at any time, by mutual consent, locate and monument the boundary line in any part of the boundary rivers in accordance with the provisions of this decree.

It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the costs of this suit shall be equally divided between the said two states and that the clerk of this court shall forthwith transmit to the chief magistrates of the states of Georgia and South Carolina copies of this decree duly authenticated under the seal of the court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Georgia v. South Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1990
    ...banks, and where there is an island, the boundary is midway between the island and the South Carolina shore. Georgia v. South Carolina, 259 U.S. 572, 42 S.Ct. 597, 66 L.Ed. 1069. The Special Master has submitted two reports, making several boundary recommendations. Both States have filed He......
  • Uhlmann Grain Co. v. Dickson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 21, 1932
    ... ... , and in violation of the laws of the state of Missouri. That the defendants at the time of ... ...
  • Boney v. Trans-State Dredging Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 2, 1960
    ... ... No. 17690 ... Supreme Court of South Carolina ... Aug. 2, 1960 ...         [237 S.C. 56] Murdaugh, ... e., from Mile 212, approximately 12 river miles below Augusta, Georgia, to Mile, 70, above Savannah; they commenced on October 29, 1958, and were ... ...
  • United States v. 450 ACRES OF LAND, ETC., 14990.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 19, 1955
    ...islands in the Savannah River and the Supreme Court by its decision and decree in State of Georgia v. South Carolina, 257 U.S. 516, 42 S.Ct. 173, 66 L.Ed. 347, Id., 259 U.S. 572, 42 S.Ct. 597, 66 L.Ed. 1069, confirmed that reservation. It follows that the condemnation proceeding was properl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT