State of Illinois v. State of Indiana
| Decision Date | 17 February 1947 |
| Docket Number | No. 9,O,9 |
| Citation | 67 S.Ct. 767,91 L.Ed. 1259,330 U.S. 799 |
| Parties | The STATE OF ILLINOIS, complainant, v. The STATE OF INDIANA et al. riginal |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The Special Report of the Special Master as to Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, and The Texas Company is approved. The amended bill of complaint is dismissed as to Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, pursuant to the stipulation entered into by and between the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, City of East Chicago, City of Hammond, and Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, and as to The Texas Company pursuant to the stipulation entered into by and among the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, the City of East Chicago and The Texas Company. Costs against Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, and The Texas Company to be taxed hereafter in accordance with the recommendations of the Special Master.
To continue reading
Request your trial
36 cases
-
State v. Hauge
......As noted by Justice Goldberg in Escobedo v. Illinois : We have .. learned the companion lesson of history that no system of criminal justice can, or should, survive if it comes to depend for its ......
-
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
...... motions to suppress that evidence, petitioner was convicted, and the State Supreme Court affirmed. Held: . 1. The warrant for ......
- United States v. Edwards 8212 88
-
United States v. On Lee
...... to be enlarged by implication, and must be confined to the precise state of facts disclosed by the record * * * There was actual entrance into the ...The search and seizure were held unconstitutional (under Illinois law) because the policemen had not volunteered their identities and the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Appendix E
...opinion); Zap v. United States , 328 U.S. 624, 66 S.Ct. 1277, 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946), vacated on other grounds, 330 U.S. 800, 67 S.Ct. 857, 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947).” ( Id . at p. 806, 94 S.Ct. 1234.) [22] California law has recognized that items lawfully seized as evidence of crime are subject t......