State of Iowa v. State of Illinois
| Decision Date | 15 January 1894 |
| Docket Number | No. 5,5 |
| Citation | 151 U.S. 238,38 L.Ed. 145,14 S.Ct. 333 |
| Parties | STATE OF IOWA v. STATE OF ILLINOIS. , original |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
M. T. Moloney, Atty. Gen., and A. W. Green and H. S. Robbins, for the motion.
John Y. Stone, John F. Lacey, F. T. Hughes, and Jas. C. Davis, opposed.
This was an original suit in equity instituted in this court to determine the boundary line between the states of Iowa and Illinois, and considered upon submission on the pleadings and the briefs of counsel.
On the 3d of January, 1893, the question at issue was decided, (Iowa v. Illinois, 147 U. S. 1, 13 Sup. Ct. 239,) and an interlocutory decree entered, whereby it was 'ordered, adjudged, and declared by this court that the boundary line between the state of Iowa and the state of Illinois is the middle of the main navigable channel of the Mississippi river at the places where the nine bridges mentioned in the pleadings cross said river; and it is further ordered that a commission be appointed to ascertain and designate at said places the boundary line between the two states, said commission consisting of three competent persons, to be named by the court upon suggestion of counsel, and be required to make a proper examination, and to delineate on maps prepared for that purpose the true line as determined by this court, and report the same to the court for its further action.'
March 6, 1893, a joint request was filed in this court, dated January 19, 1893, signed by the attorneys general of the two states concerned, requesting the appointment of certain persons therein suggested as commissioners to fix the boundary line, and that the line be located at once at the Keokuk and Hamilton bridge, and on the next day an order was entered in accordance with this request, as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Commonwealth of Virginia v. State of West Virginia
... ... 423; Id., 15 Pet. 233, 10 L. Ed. 721; Id., 4 How. 591, 11 L. Ed. 1116; Massachusetts v. Rhode Island, 12 Pet. 755, 9 L. Ed. 1272; Missouri v. Iowa, 7 How. 659, 12 L. Ed. 861; Id., 10 How. 1, 13 L. Ed. 303; Florida v. Georgia, 11 How. 293, 13 L. Ed. 702; Id., 17 How. 478, 15 L. Ed. 181; Alabama ... Ed. 164; Nebraska v. Iowa, 143 U. S. 359, 12 Sup. Ct. 396, 36 L. Ed. 186; Id., 145 U. S. 519, 12 Sup. Ct. 976, 36 L. Ed. 798; Iowa v. Illinois, 147 U. S. 1, 13 Sup. Ct. 239, 37 L. Ed. 55; Id., 151 U. S. 238, 14 Sup. Ct. 333, 38 L. Ed. 145; Id., 202 U. S. 59, 26 Sup. Ct. 571, 50 L. Ed. 934; ... ...
-
Sutton v. Anderson
...76 Fed. 761; Ogden City v. Weaver (C.C.A.), 108 Fed. 564; Short v. Kidd (Mo.), 197 S.W. 64; State v. Riley, 219 Mo. 667; Iowa v. Illinois, 151 U.S. 238; Reilly v. Perkins (Ariz.), 56 Pac. 734. (5) An order made outside of the scope and in conflict with the pleading upon which it purports to......
-
Sutton v. Anderson
... ... 1919, ... sec. 1300; Ford v. Motor Car Co., 209 Mo. 144; ... State ex rel. Motor Car Co. v. Allen, 239 S.W. 105; ... Wells v. Cochran, 35 ... 121 F. 533; De Laval Separator Co. v. Sharpless, 134 ... Iowa 28, 111 N.W. 438. (2) When money is deposited in court ... on conditions ... S.W. 64; State v. Riley, 219 Mo. 667; Iowa v ... Illinois, 151 U.S. 238; Reilly v. Perkins ... (Ariz.), 56 P. 734. (5) An order ... ...
-
State of North Dakota v. State of Minnesota
... ... In the remaining 13 the costs were equally divided ... In Nebraska v. Iowa. 143 U. S. 359, 370, 12 Sup. Ct. 396, 400 (36 L. Ed. 186) Justice Brewer, speaking for the court, said: ... 'The costs of this ... for South Dakota for the amount due, with costs of suit ... In Missouri v. Illinois, 200 U. S. 496, 26 Sup. Ct. 268, 50 L. Ed. 572, which was a bill to restrain Illinois and her subordinate agency, the Chicago Sanitary District, from ... ...